+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Type 38 Training Rifle - safe to fire?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dirtytwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    07-04-2013 @ 03:23 PM
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    7
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    03:24 PM

    Type 38 Training Rifle - safe to fire?

    I'm a little late on this question, I should ask: "Was it safe to fire!?"

    I tested a Type 38 that looked complete in every way: standard sights, dust cover, barrel looked decent with OK riflings (a bit of wear at the muzzle). The 'mum was gone, and I don't mean ground off, it looked like it never had one. With factory Norma ammo, I couldn't get it on paper at 100yds, it looked like it was shooting low, smacking the ground even with the rear sight flipped-up and set at 800 yds. After 17 shots, mostly with pierced primers and the primer sticking out a bit, I ceased fire. It was then that I noticed that it had the two "00" in front of the serial number.

    Did I flirt with death? Or are training rifles relatively safe but may have failed some standard for accuracy?

    Thanks in advance!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member kar98k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    02-13-2021 @ 05:50 PM
    Location
    PHX
    Posts
    327
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    i wouldn't have fired it. but the smooth bore trainers are the ones you absolutely cannot fire.

  3. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dirtytwo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    07-04-2013 @ 03:23 PM
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    7
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    03:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Definitely not a smoothbore and the action wasn't as crude as I've seen some of those training rifles (well, in pics, I've never seen one up close). It had the "38 Type" Japaneseicon characters near the vent holes but it looked from every angle to have never had a 'mum on it. If it was ground off, it was the most professional job I've ever seen! The serial number was in the 5 digits including the two zeros, in the mid 200s (possibly early-1905 production?) The firing pin protruded a fair bit from the bolt face, so I'm assuming it has seen a lot of dry firing which makes a lot of sense if it was a training rifle. All-in-all it was a decent piece but I couldn't shoot the sea if I was on a ship with it!

  4. #4
    Legacy Member sfoster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    05-13-2025 @ 11:54 AM
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    06-11-2025
    Local Time
    03:24 PM
    Very possibly a Chinese communist rework. Overhauled, fired a bazilliion time, and repaired with a poorly fitting firing pin. From your info, that is just my guess. A fair number of Arisakas came out of China in the 90's.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Type 38 and Type 99 Rifle/Ammo Questions
    By masterdiver330 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-31-2011, 07:10 PM
  2. Type 99 Long Rifle; What Type Of Wood?
    By kar98k in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-17-2010, 10:32 PM
  3. Maximum Safe Radial Expansion for Brass Cased Rifle Cartridges
    By jmoore in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-02-2010, 07:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts