+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: P14 - Fatboy

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Tertle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    08-06-2015 @ 10:20 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Age
    54
    Posts
    38
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    07:22 PM

    P14 - Fatboy

    Team,

    I have just picked up a P14, its a fatboy, well thats what ive been told its called??

    I did some swaps with some stuff that i wasnt using and was only going to send down range and to be honest with the amount of cast lead stuff im making at the moment, well it was stuff just lying around anyway.

    But the new addition is very impresive, im rather rapt in it. Its even NZicon marked!

    Its got some markings on the butt that i am unfamiliar with and was hoping that someone here might be able to give me some indication as what to they mean or reference to?

    cheers

    Mark

    Attachment 27048Attachment 27049Attachment 27050
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:24 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,003
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    12:22 AM
    I take it it was made by Eddystone, at least that's what it says. the marks on the butt disc say as you suspect March of 17 to NZicon. The muzzle is Alf Parker ball burnished for accuracy. The left side of the forend is set up for the volley sights. Fat Boy? Never heard of it.
    Regards, Jim

  3. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    03:22 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    Fat Boy? Never heard of it.
    It's a reference to the "no finger groove" stocks found on some Eddystones. The above is an example.

  6. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to jmoore For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member husk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:18 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    175
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    02:22 AM
    Actually, it's a reference to the fact that the stock on Eddystone's bulges ( near the front volley sight ). This isn't the case with the Remington or Winchester M1917s. Not sure if the term was coined in the US or Englandicon.

  8. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to husk For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    03:22 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by husk View Post
    Actually, it's a reference to the fact that the stock on Eddystone's bulges ( near the front volley sight ).
    Pardon my ignoring the obvious!

  10. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Tertle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    08-06-2015 @ 10:20 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Age
    54
    Posts
    38
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    07:22 PM
    Thread Starter
    sorry moderators i never knew this section existed!!! Say thanks guys for the input, but the "+" on the butt, any ideas, and the reason it has the front dial smoothed back removing the ranges but still has rear lobbing sight? its a great looking rifle and am very keen to get her down to the range!

  11. #7
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:24 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,003
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    12:22 AM
    The volley sights were removed along the way but hard to say just who or when. If one is present and not the other, I suspect an individual taste was the reason for removal. I don't remember what the cross proof means.
    Regards, Jim

  12. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Tertle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    08-06-2015 @ 10:20 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Age
    54
    Posts
    38
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    07:22 PM
    Thread Starter
    underneath the barrel just back from the foresight and towards the nose cap was a BSA logo with BSA Target Quality, Made for Parker Hale Ltd, Birmingham 4 Englandicon.

    Its also been pointed out to me its a MkI not MkI*, still working on its history though, but still rather happy with it all,

  13. #9
    Contributing Member Promo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,888
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    09:22 AM
    As far as I know the + on the butt ment emergency use only. Looks like someone removed the screw for the volley sight dialer; I'm not sure as I'd need to see a better picture, but could be that the base for the dialer has been milled off what could be the reason why it's only partially here.

    There should be an ERA on the reciever just above the S/N. Also check the backside of the sight, there should be the S/N of the rifle on top. Is there a * punchmark on the reciever?

  14. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Tertle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    08-06-2015 @ 10:20 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Age
    54
    Posts
    38
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    07:22 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Promo View Post
    As far as I know the + on the butt ment emergency use only. Looks like someone removed the screw for the volley sight dialer; I'm not sure as I'd need to see a better picture, but could be that the base for the dialer has been milled off what could be the reason why it's only partially here.

    There should be an ERA on the reciever just above the S/N. Also check the backside of the sight, there should be the S/N of the rifle on top. Is there a * punchmark on the reciever?
    Promo if you have a look at the bottom of No3 | | All About EnfieldsAll About Enfields there is a set of pictures that i took, rather quickly sadly and i need to get a better camera but it should answer some of your questions.

    Now my understanding of emergency use or EY Enfields, that standard may be different for the P14? asve been over thislike a hawk and now had two good collectors look at it and both seem impressed with the mechanical aspect and bore barrel reciever condition, is it the fact that it was a non standard rifle of the day make it EY? or am i missing something?

    I am appreciating all the feed back and comments here to, thanks

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts