+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Enfield Trainers No 9s

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Gnr527's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    02-19-2024 @ 01:38 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    146
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    09:54 AM

    Enfield Trainers No 9s

    Possibly this might be added to the above thread at some time.

    I would like to add to my(our?) knowledge of the No 9 .22 trainer.

    The most I have been able to find at present is that within Lee-Enfield Rifle No.9 for the Royal Navy, Ian Skennertons 'The Lee-Enfield' and Dennis Lewis/Robert Washburn's 'Britishicon .22RF Training Rifles'.

    In summary:-

    Few produced - 3000ish
    Produced by 'Parker Hale' of Birmingham
    Plus some produced to spec by 'others' - unofficial - few or no details available
    'Parkerifled' sleeved barrels - by Alfred G Parker or Parker Hale?

    Questions -
    How many are left out there? - Fultons told me they might get one a year!
    Of those still around - any of the original Royal Navy production?
    Do any cadet forces have any?
    Did anyone else sleeve barrels - I have one sleeved by A J Parker - I understood that AJ and AG Parker were not necessarily on the best of terms?

    A number of other questions but this in the hope of getting a ball rolling.

    Answers? Questions?

    John
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:17 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,177
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    07:54 PM
    Just a quick look at the timeline, Athur Gray Parker died in 1915, A.G. Parker jnr. died in 1939, His son A.J Parker died in 1975.
    The falling out between A.G and A.J was over the monopoly of the Hales, (cousins) in the firm. After A.J split from the firm it became PARKER HALE in 1936.
    Now as the No.9's were converted by P H between 1956 and 1960, that effectively rules out the Parkers direct involvement.
    The only reason the occasional Parkerifled A.G.P was on the crowns of some of these rifles was because the early patents of A.G were still current.
    3000 is a small number,so a survival rate would be very low, that you have one marked A.J.P is even stranger and maybe even rarer.

  3. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Frank LE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Last On
    Today @ 03:57 AM
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    91
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Sme pics of my No9 Mk1.
    Low serial number, sleeved barrell with Parker AGP marking, matching wood, german import marks
    Where to find any navy markings?
    Attachment 27784Attachment 27783Attachment 27785Attachment 27786

  6. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Frank LE For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member Gnr527's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    02-19-2024 @ 01:38 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    146
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Frank
    Have you looked at Lee-Enfield Rifle No.9 for the Royal Navy - the rifle shewn there is very close to yours and was apparently part of the Navy contract.
    I don't know of any Unit markings.

  8. #5
    Legacy Member harry mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-28-2024 @ 05:34 PM
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    471
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    10:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank LE View Post
    Sme pics of my No9 Mk1.
    Low serial number, sleeved barrell with Parker AGP marking, matching wood, german import marks
    Where to find any navy markings?
    Attachment 27784Attachment 27783Attachment 27785Attachment 27786
    The naval marking you ask about is staring right at you. Notice the inscription on the receiver doesn't say "No9", it says "N.9". N in this instance stands for Naval, or so I believe.
    If not, then feel free to pelt me with rotten cyber-veg.

  9. #6
    Contributing Member
    Buccaneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    09-13-2024 @ 04:08 PM
    Location
    Cardiff Wales UK
    Posts
    474
    Real Name
    Paul Ellis
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    10:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by harry mac View Post
    The naval marking you ask about is staring right at you. Notice the inscription on the receiver doesn't say "No9", it says "N.9". N in this instance stands for Naval, or so I believe.
    If not, then feel free to pelt me with rotten cyber-veg.
    I have borrowed a "No9" from a friend to take some photos and realise that it does actually have No9 engraved on the action and not N 9 as shown on other rifles and also in Skennertonicon. The rifle looks right but is in "mint" condition with hardly a mark on it which a little worrying, the hand guard is not fluted and neither the forend nor the bolt carry a serial number. I think it could be a "clone" but before I break the good or bad news I would value other peoples opinions. Phots to follow.

  10. #7
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:25 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,558
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    10:54 AM
    There were still a dribble of N9's (and No7's) doing the rounds of the School Cadet Forces back in the 80's, alongside the old No8's but with the introduction of the CVadet SA80 rifles and then the .22" sub calibre kits, the 7's and 9's were back-loaded or disposed of.

    Additionally, my sons school shooting rep told me that there were fewer and fewer military/schools shooting competitions that allowed these rifles as the specified rifle was the 'as issued' No8 rifle and even in open comps, the old No4 types couldn't compete with the modern Anschutz's. Once the Army took over the whole of the small arms repair schedule (beyond unit level) there were no spares and even less interest for these odd-balls.

    There were a few No7's at Aldershot that had been cannibalised for spares (that I stripped/finished off and eventually wrote off). Once one of these rifles was condemned, the school/unit (some of the Sea Cadets and RAF Cadets had them too) would get a No8 as a replacement.

  11. #8
    Legacy Member newcastle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-15-2024 @ 12:11 PM
    Posts
    920
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    02:54 AM
    I used one in 1982 to earn my cadet Marksman badge. I remember being excited because it looked juts like a NO.4. Are the No.9s repeaters or single shot?

  12. #9
    Legacy Member Gnr527's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    02-19-2024 @ 01:38 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    146
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    09:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Single shot and a PITA to load that shot.
    Extract drops the case into the empty magazine.

  13. #10
    Contributing Member
    Buccaneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    09-13-2024 @ 04:08 PM
    Location
    Cardiff Wales UK
    Posts
    474
    Real Name
    Paul Ellis
    Local Date
    09-22-2024
    Local Time
    10:54 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by newcastle View Post
    I used one in 1982 to earn my cadet Marksman badge. I remember being excited because it looked juts like a NO.4. Are the No.9s repeaters or single shot?
    The No7 was the "repeater" the No9 was just a single shot and as Gnr527 has pionted out with no loading platform they are a swine to load especially when you have hands the size of mine!!
    I own a commercial "No9" made by AG Parker it is identicle to the service issue rifle including the rear sight "25 yard" graduation mark. The action is a reworked No4 MK1 the left side of the butt socket still bears M47 1943 with the original serial number haveing been ground away and replaced with AG 2553. It is all matching numbers including the forend and magazine though the latter has a number barred out with the new AG number below. I am hoping to get a look at a "genuine" No9 over the weekend and get some pictures of both of these rifles on the site as soon as I can.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. .22 Trainers?
    By clarkmilitaria in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-27-2011, 09:54 PM
  2. .22 Enfield trainers with AM*** serial numbers
    By rattrod30 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-22-2010, 09:50 PM
  3. Trainers
    By Amatikulu in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-12-2009, 11:00 AM
  4. .22 Trainers
    By Alan de Enfield in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-17-2009, 10:22 AM
  5. 03 trainers
    By sdh1911 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-13-2007, 08:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts