+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Longbranch No.4 Mk1*

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Littlejohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last On
    04-28-2025 @ 01:00 AM
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    91
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    08:24 AM

    Longbranch No.4 Mk1*

    Hello. First post here. Thought I'd share some photos of the Enfield I acquired recently. It's not in the greatest of condition, but the bore is good, and it's quite accurate. The buttstock wood appears to be beech, while the forestock and handguards are walnut. The cocking piece is unlike most others I have seen. Whats the story on that? Very interesting site you have here.
    Thanks.
    Attachment 43250Attachment 43251Attachment 43252Attachment 43248Attachment 43249
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to Littlejohn For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member rgg_7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last On
    04-28-2025 @ 11:31 PM
    Location
    Niagara
    Posts
    531
    Real Name
    Ron
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    09:24 AM
    Early 1942. 1st variation cocking piece found on 1941 and early 42"s. Is the sight marked "LB". If so you have quite the find. Ron(Canadaicon)

  4. Thank You to rgg_7 For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member Littlejohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last On
    04-28-2025 @ 01:00 AM
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    91
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    08:24 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by rgg_7 View Post
    Early 1942. 1st variation cocking piece found on 1941 and early 42"s. Is the sight marked "LB". If so you have quite the find. Ron(Canadaicon)
    Thanks for the information on the cocking piece. Here are the rear sight markings.

    Attachment 43253Attachment 43254

  7. #4
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 06:07 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,202
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    11:24 PM
    That is an interesting one.......and I don't normally give No.4's a second glance.

  8. Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Legacy Member Time Bandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last On
    03-05-2021 @ 08:08 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    96
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    01:24 PM
    That looks like a ROF Poole marking?
    Mike

  10. #6
    Legacy Member gsimmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    02-22-2025 @ 06:49 PM
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,368
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    08:24 AM
    It most likely had a mk2 sight and someone changed it. Wasn't Poole post war?



  11. #7
    Legacy Member Time Bandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last On
    03-05-2021 @ 08:08 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    96
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    01:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by gsimmons View Post
    Wasn't Poole post war?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
    I think it opened in the early '40s but I'm not sure what they did at that time - maybe making sights was one of their things then? They seemed more prominent after the war when they started making bayonets - No.5's, No.7's & No.9's which is maybe why they are more often associated with post war production?
    Mike

  12. #8
    Legacy Member paul87buick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    06-17-2021 @ 01:09 AM
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    105
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    06:24 AM
    I just had a look at the Knowledge Libraryicon at the Pakistani no4 its rear sight is a p in circle so I would say Pakistani ordnance factory .A seen them with just a p no circle,Poole or Pakistani I don't know ?

  13. #9
    Legacy Member Time Bandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last On
    03-05-2021 @ 08:08 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    96
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    01:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by paul87buick View Post
    I just had a look at the Knowledge Libraryicon at the Pakistani no4 its rear sight is a p in circle so I would say Pakistani ordnance factory .A seen them with just a p no circle,Poole or Pakistani I don't know ?
    This one is definitely a Poole marking - the F3B marking just above the circle P, that's one of the inspection marks that is found on Poole made bayonets.
    Mike

  14. Thank You to Time Bandit For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,008
    Local Date
    04-30-2025
    Local Time
    06:24 AM
    That is a very interesting rifle, and as your probably know, a very early one for Long Branch: first 30,000 made.

    The alignment of the number stamps looks like it was done by machine, but it wasn't.

    If you could post a few photos of the muzzle area and other side of the rifle and receiver, we might be able to tell you a bit more.

    It would probably have had the two position peep sight (300/600) as production of the MkI backsight fell behind production of rifles fairly early on.

    Looks from this distance like it was probably restocked in UKicon service, and painted, so your call whether to leave it "as found" or "restore".

    Two groove barrel or five groove?
    Last edited by Surpmil; 05-27-2013 at 10:00 PM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  16. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 41 longbranch
    By oldhound in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-13-2013, 05:35 PM
  2. Longbranch MP with Pic,s
    By manitou210 in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-26-2012, 04:43 PM
  3. Longbranch Help
    By garra in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-22-2010, 10:54 AM
  4. Longbranch No.4 Mk1*(T)
    By Amatikulu in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-05-2009, 07:57 PM
  5. #4 MK1 Longbranch
    By weekender in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-28-2009, 10:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts