Long branch sniper serial number question

[Craig Eberhardt]

Could long branch rifle serial number 45L1151 be a real sniper?

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Warren]

Yes... I am finding serial numbers of Long Branch snipers made for tests and trials all over the spectrum of the serial number range.

[Craig Eberhardt]

Yes... I am finding serial numbers of Long Branch snipers made for tests and trials all over the spectrum of the serial number range.

Thanks Warren,

Any distinguishing marks or features that I should look for to determine authenticity? Was the scope number stamped on the wrist etc?

Your help is greatly appreciated.

Craig

[lee_enfield223]

I looked at the sniper that you are looking at on used guns and it looks legit !!! but it does not have a T or the TR marking the pads look like originals that were fitted by a factory as they are staked ,,, I was going to buy it but I already have a mint English No4 T,,, and the scope needs a clean as it's slightly cloudy

[H.e.s.h]

I got some better photos from the owner of this one, rear sight is missing. The pads dont look like they are staked but the photos arent the best. I have seen a few genuines lately that look the same?

[Lee Enfield]

I looked at the sniper that you are looking at on used guns and it looks legit !!! but it does not have a T or the TR marking the pads look like originals that were fitted by a factory as they are staked ,,, I was going to buy it but I already have a mint English No4 T,,, and the scope needs a clean as it's slightly cloudy

A 1943 dated Long Branch sniper should not have a T or TR.

To answer the OP, yes, it could be a real LB "T".

I would want to see pictures of the pads and a few other things.

As warren has pointed out more than once, sometimes the naysayers don't know what they are talking about, and sometimes they want it themselves.

Having said that I would want to have some detailed photos of the rifle and (if matching) LB scope mount before putting the money down.

And unlike a lot of the people (even on here) who typically say things like "it isn't/can't be real" I actually have some Long Branch snipers.

[Warren]

Early Canadian pads were not stamped.
The punch marks on the early kit was done by the British.
The British were not happy with a few things we did but then we were new at the game...sniper wise.

[Craig Eberhardt]

Thanks guys,

Should it have a scope number stamped on the wrist?

What other things should I look for.

Regards

Craig

[lee_enfield223]

this one does not have a number stamped on the wrist it looks like a standard no4 except for the pads, anyway that's what I saw when it was offered to me

[Craig Eberhardt]

This one turned out not to be a long branch sniper after all. The seller realised his misdescription and notified me. Full marks for his honesty.