+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Reducing number of No.4 Barrel grooves to speed production?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    chanman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    10-01-2015 @ 10:29 PM
    Posts
    6
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    03:16 AM

    Reducing number of No.4 Barrel grooves to speed production?

    This was bugging me. Weren't No.4 barrels broach cut with all the grooves cut all at once?

    Does the time savings come from simply having to remove less material per barrel, or does the time savings come from saving time making the broaches?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:41 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,284
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    08:16 PM
    Useful article here:

    Firearms History, Technology Development: Rifling: Manufacturing: Broach Rifling

    Broaching requires a serious upgrade in machinery from the basic “single-tooth” cutter method.

    Once up and running, the production rate is quite high; the complex tool travels through the bore ONCE and the rifling is finished.

    The other contender is cold (hammer) forging, as developed by out Teutonic cousins. They had to come up with a production technique that could keep up with their consumption of machine-gun barrels. When you have a fleet of thousands of MG-34 and MG-42 (and several other) guns at “work”, the demand for replacement barrels is ferocious.

    The only fly in that ointment is the supply of suitable materials and machinery to make the mandrels and the rotary-hammer machines themselves.

    The US used broach-cutting for some production; one notable product was all of the National Match M-14 barrels.

    They also used a LOT of “traditional” machines.

    Meanwhile, also in the US, another method arose: “buttoning”. The idea dates back to the late 19th century. However, it languished until the engineers at Remington refined it in the early 1940s

  3. The Following 9 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member rayg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last On
    03-06-2025 @ 04:22 PM
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,053
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    04:16 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    Useful article here:

    Firearms History, Technology Development: Rifling: Manufacturing: Broach Rifling

    Broaching requires a serious upgrade in machinery from the basic “single-tooth” cutter method.

    Once up and running, the production rate is quite high; the complex tool travels through the bore ONCE and the rifling is finished.

    The other contender is cold (hammer) forging, as developed by out Teutonic cousins. They had to come up with a production technique that could keep up with their consumption of machine-gun barrels. When you have a fleet of thousands of MG-34 and MG-42 (and several other) guns at “work”, the demand for replacement barrels is ferocious.

    The only fly in that ointment is the supply of suitable materials and machinery to make the mandrels and the rotary-hammer machines themselves.

    The US used broach-cutting for some production; one notable product was all of the National Match M-14 barrels.

    They also used a LOT of “traditional” machines.

    Meanwhile, also in the US, another method arose: “buttoning”. The idea dates back to the late 19th century. However, it languished until the engineers at Remington refined it in the early 1940s
    What a great link, fully explains the different rifling methods, Ray

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    chanman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    10-01-2015 @ 10:29 PM
    Posts
    6
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    03:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Does that mean that all Enfield barrels single-point cut then?

  7. #5
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:41 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,284
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    08:16 PM
    If they were using machinery built to make SMLE barrels, quite possibly.

    If you have a shed full of "single-tooth" cutting machines, you can turn out a lot of barrels each day.

    A shed full of machines hauling broaches will rifle a LOT more, though.

    Part of the reason for the "two-groove" barrel was to greatly reduce machine time per barrel whilst using "conventional" cutters. Broaching a two-groove barrel would likewise involve a slightly "less-expensive" tool`

    Certainly, SMLE barrels of pretty much any denomination were rifled with "single-tooth" cutters; as for what happened in WW2 with No4 barrels? I don't have that paperwork.

  8. Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:54 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,654
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:16 AM
    Single tooth cutters - using a lot of machines!

  10. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-22-2025 @ 03:38 AM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,312
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:16 AM
    The article in the link below I,ve always found it to be an excellent read and look at the picture of the P & W sine bar rifling machine made in 1885.......

    The Making of a Rifled Barrel, FirearmsID.com

  12. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to bigduke6 For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Legacy Member Simon P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    05-10-2025 @ 02:15 AM
    Location
    Essex. UK.
    Posts
    645
    Real Name
    Simon Pemberton
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:16 AM
    There one for sale at the moment for £15K
    Regards Simon

  14. #9
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-22-2025 @ 03:38 AM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,312
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:16 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon P View Post
    There one for sale at the moment for £15K
    Any more info Simon ?

  15. #10
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 02:02 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,432
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:16 AM
    The list of machining operations I have here from Savage says:
    Operation Sequence No.27
    operation #32A - rifle on Builders Rifling Machine
    type of tools:- ET-6 rifling head ET-6A wedge ET-6B wedge ET-6C wedge ET-250 hook cutter ET-287 shank
    Standard time for 100 Pcs 11.046

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Production date by serial number
    By USMC6094 in forum Swiss Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-13-2012, 11:38 PM
  2. 1941 Long Branch No.4 Mk.1 - how many grooves in barrel?
    By spinecracker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-13-2010, 11:33 PM
  3. serial number years of production
    By duggaboy in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-10-2009, 10:23 PM
  4. serial number years of production
    By duggaboy in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 09:57 PM
  5. How Many Barrel Grooves ?
    By leecorky in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-29-2009, 12:20 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts