+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: 1902 RSAF Enfield LE/ 1910 CLLE

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Anzac15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Suwanee, Ga.
    Posts
    1,491
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 AM

    1902 RSAF Enfield LE/ 1910 CLLE

    This one arrived today. She's a 1902 Enfield LE I, CLLE'd in 1910. Appears to be some lettering above the '1910', but too worn. Appears to be in a somewhat crude stock, Indian buttstock, Indian bolt. There is a 'Y' on the knoxform and barrel. Meaning?
    Am I to assume that this was a 'Long Lee' originally? This one has definitely been around the block. Would love to hear some input on it!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Anzac15 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:26 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,333
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 AM
    Could you remove the handguard to show the barrel markings - thanks RCS

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Anzac15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Suwanee, Ga.
    Posts
    1,491
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    About the extent of them...

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:42 PM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,250
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    03:06 PM
    The "surface grade" on the metal and wood seems somewhat "agricultural".

    any details on the "background" of this one?

  7. #5
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    05-29-2024 @ 02:31 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    775
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    05:06 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    The "surface grade" on the metal and wood seems somewhat "agricultural".

    any details on the "background" of this one?
    I also have some concerns about this rifle.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Anzac15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Suwanee, Ga.
    Posts
    1,491
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    Let's hear it, want to hear all thoughts.

    ---------- Post added at 06:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------

    There are remnants of other markings here and there, but worn to a point to where you can't tell what they were.

  9. #7
    Legacy Member Terrylee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:04 PM
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    211
    Real Name
    Terence Willson
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:06 AM
    Appears to be very close to the configuration of the S.M.L.E. Mk.IV. Probably upgraded.

  10. #8
    Legacy Member Steve H. in N.Y.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:24 PM
    Location
    You get one guess
    Posts
    525
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    01:06 AM
    The butt socket markings look alright to me. What makes me wonder is the crude rivet job on the charger bridge and strange rear handguard clip installation. For some reason the rear triggerguard screw is in backwards. Is this a Tennesse Guns (TGI) import?
    Last edited by Steve H. in N.Y.; 08-16-2014 at 07:24 PM.

  11. #9
    Legacy Member Anzac15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Suwanee, Ga.
    Posts
    1,491
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    I'm afraid I put that screw in backwards by accident. I honestly don't know WHAT I have here. Mag release appears to be a No 4, as does the magazine. I've no doubt the receiver is genuine.

    ---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 PM ----------

    Oh, and no....not a TGI mport.

  12. #10
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:42 PM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,250
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    03:06 PM
    If you could get that rear trigger-guard screw in "the wrong way", there is something seriously wrong with the threads on the screw, the receiver, or both.

    If it ONLY fits that way, there is DEFINITELY something fishy about the receiver. If it fits either way and the screw simply drops in, the threads are seriously defective.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 1902 Lee Enfield Calvary Carbine
    By Kman in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2013, 11:31 AM
  2. RSAF Enfield current day visit ( photos )
    By Joshby in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-27-2012, 04:06 PM
  3. 1924 ShtLE (Short Lee-Enfield) No.1 MkV Rifle (Mfg by RSAF Enfield)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-07-2007, 12:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts