+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: No4 Mk1 Finish

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Col.Colt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Last On
    03-12-2019 @ 12:24 AM
    Location
    NorthWest
    Posts
    41
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    03:06 AM

    No4 Mk1 Finish

    Can anyone tell me if the finish on this No4 Mk1 is original? Any help would be appreciated .
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:40 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,693
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    If you mean 'original' in as it left the factory in whatever, then I'd say NO simply because it's too good. From photo 2, looking towards the top of the body, it looks like a quick blow job with a can of satin black aerosol. But I could be wrong.

  3. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Col.Colt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Last On
    03-12-2019 @ 12:24 AM
    Location
    NorthWest
    Posts
    41
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    03:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    Hi Peter, Yes if even looks like the paint run on the side of the receiver. Were any of the receivers painted with black paint from the factory? The gun has "K" serial number so I assume is must be of BSA manufacture. All the serial numbers match. The guns looks as though it was never issued that's why I question the finish.

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ssj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last On
    11-13-2017 @ 01:21 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    651
    Local Date
    07-08-2025
    Local Time
    12:06 AM
    I would have said WW2 No4 mk1s were blackened or blued and not painted. I think 1950s FTR'd guns though might well have small parts black painted?

    Also paint could be used to hide a non-matching serial number. From experience I dont like it when I cant see the original condition of something, it is usually a bad sign.

    regards

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    303tom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Last On
    10-27-2018 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    249
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    07:06 AM
    Original ? NO !.................

  7. #6
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,069
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    04:06 AM
    You might as well strip it off and do it yourself IMO. Almost looks like a brush job with the bits stuck in it.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Col.Colt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Last On
    03-12-2019 @ 12:24 AM
    Location
    NorthWest
    Posts
    41
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    03:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    Yes, It dose appear to be brushed on. So it is safe to assume it did not come out of the BSA factory like that?

  9. #8
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:40 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,693
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    FTR guns were all painted SSJ, same as Base Workshop repairs. That was the problem with the Fazakerley No4's, Sten guns and L2A3 guns. The serial numbers were etched VERY lightly then after the first Base workshop or FTR, they'd become invisible.

  10. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:

    ssj

  11. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ssj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last On
    11-13-2017 @ 01:21 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    651
    Local Date
    07-08-2025
    Local Time
    12:06 AM
    Yes....and I'd be concerned on what nasties the paint is hiding.

  12. #10
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:40 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,693
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    You can be rest assured that the wood definately didn't come from BSA or anywhere like that either! What it really needs is a proper FTR finish. That is bead blast back to white metal, deep phosphate and then painting

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Odd finish on Russian TT-33
    By Milsurp Collector in forum Other Military Service Pistols and Revolvers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-07-2012, 08:28 PM
  2. LB No. 4 finish?
    By dave284 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-21-2012, 07:18 PM
  3. Original finish?
    By Tom William in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 10:42 AM
  4. 03 N.M. finish?
    By DANCESWITHEMPTIES in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-31-2010, 03:29 PM
  5. Stock finish
    By cary m2a in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-08-2009, 08:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts