+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Decoding SMLE markings

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

Wainwrightbagger Decoding SMLE markings 09-10-2015, 11:03 AM
Peter Laidler I would say that that is the... 09-10-2015, 11:19 AM
Colonel Enfield I'd suggest they were... 09-12-2015, 03:43 AM
Wainwrightbagger Thanks Peter and Colonel. I... 09-12-2015, 07:56 AM
Peter Laidler At the ROF's, '.....as soon... 09-12-2015, 08:11 AM
5thBatt There are plenty of rifles... 09-12-2015, 06:19 PM
Colonel Enfield Looks like that rifle was... 09-12-2015, 11:27 PM
5thBatt The whole of the III* is... 09-13-2015, 02:23 AM
browningautorifle Love those early marked... 09-13-2015, 11:12 AM
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Wainwrightbagger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Last On
    12-22-2021 @ 06:07 PM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    12:03 PM

    Decoding SMLE markings

    Just been trying to decode the markings on my SMLE No1 Mk 3. Think I've figured most of it out but was surprised when I looked at the year stamp through a magnifying glass that it has been very clearly initially stamped as 1917 with an 8 very precisely overstamped on the 7. Without magnification it is hard to see this over stamping.
    Just wondering why this would happen? Simple error on the production line or was it held back over a Christmas holiday period? Am I being naiive imagining a Christmas holiday in Sparkbrook towards the end of the war?
    Any thoughts gratefully received.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    05-25-2025 @ 04:33 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,663
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    11:03 AM
    I would say that that is the only explanation. A late 1917 body finished in 1918 although in the big wide world, the date on the body has no bearing on it. Seen Brens dated 1942 with a proof date of 1943 so clearly late '42 production

  3. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Legacy Member Colonel Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last On
    07-09-2024 @ 09:12 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    279
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    08:03 PM
    I'd suggest they were churning out action bodies as fast as they possibly could, then basically pouring them into giant parts bins from which they were taken as needed on the assembly line. Quite probable the action was made and stamped in 1917 but didn't actually come out of the parts pile and become assembled into a full rifle until 1918.

    I know Webley & Scott certainly did something like that - it's not at all unheard of for Webley revolvers to have serial numbers from a particular production year, but manufacture/proof markings from years (sometimes more than a decade!) later.

  5. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Colonel Enfield For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Legacy Member Wainwrightbagger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Last On
    12-22-2021 @ 06:07 PM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    12:03 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks Peter and Colonel. I must admit to being impressed by the standard of the stamping, it is absolutely spot on, it really does look like 1918 to the naked eye (well mine anyway) and the 7 can only be seen by use of magnification.

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    05-25-2025 @ 04:33 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,663
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    11:03 AM
    At the ROF's, '.....as soon as practicably possible following final inspection' (the words used), the allocated serial number was marked on the body. At this point onwards, the part became registered and accountable

  8. #6
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    03-27-2025 @ 11:44 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    778
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    11:03 PM
    There are plenty of rifles out there where the barrel date is a year later than the receiver, the receiver was made one year & then assembled into a rifle the following year, quite common & the year on the receiver is unaltered, the over stuck year is more likely due to the stamp not being changed as the year changed over & then had to be corrected to keep the books straight, the most commonly encounter examples of over stamped years are 1918 BSAs

  9. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Legacy Member Colonel Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last On
    07-09-2024 @ 09:12 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    279
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    08:03 PM
    Looks like that rifle was originally intended to be a Mk III (no star), too - the * looks like a later stamping, presumably from when the date was remarked as the gun was assembled?

  11. #8
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    03-27-2025 @ 11:44 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    778
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    11:03 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel Enfield View Post
    Looks like that rifle was originally intended to be a Mk III (no star), too - the * looks like a later stamping, presumably from when the date was remarked as the gun was assembled?
    The whole of the III* is centralized below the markings so was a III* from the start, if not the middle I in III would be central as on these MkIIIs



    a 1917 MkIII*

  12. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:49 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,090
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    05-28-2025
    Local Time
    03:03 AM
    Love those early marked rifles. Those would resemble artwork...
    Regards, Jim

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Markings on 1943 Lithgow SMLE
    By Stumblebum in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 10:36 PM
  2. SMLE Markings
    By Bruce_in_Oz in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-16-2012, 04:54 PM
  3. Question on SMLE Markings
    By Robert303 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-23-2012, 07:51 PM
  4. Another SMLE sling, markings?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 05:09 AM
  5. nota smle per se: but a 22 with all the British markings
    By Pelago in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-11-2009, 10:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...