Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose
There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet.
Those aren't Dakotas are they, sort of hunchbacked at the tail...thicker...
Regards, Jim
If you are talking about the aircraft, They are C-46's. I flew into K-9, Pusan East in one.
Yes, that's what I was asking. I forgot you had firsthand experience there...looking at those guys must bring back some fond memories...and a few others.
Here's a couple of links of interest... Curtiss C-46 Commando - Wikipedia
Here's one showing how many remain, surprising after this time. List of surviving Curtiss C-46 Commandos - Wikipedia
Regards, Jim
There is a TV show called "Ice Pilots" that takes place in the wilds of Canada. They fly a C 46 in that show,
BEAR
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:38 PM ----------
The C 46 did not have self sealing tanks that made it an easy target for ground fire. Not exactly what paratroopers like to ride in for combat jumps.
The Brits, who like to call aircraft by names, called them the Commando. They flew me into Korea and out after my fifty mission B26 tour. When I was in the USAF, we hardly ever called an aircraft by its name, only by it number, ergo: B-47, B-29 F-51, F-80 except for Gooney Bird.
FWIW.
Did they ever get the C-46 fuel leak problem worked or or do they fly with an exception certificate and fire observers like the B-29s?
Bob
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring
Bob
I do not know about the fuel leak in the C-46. I took only two flights in a C-46-one the worst (into Korea) and the other the best (out of Korea) .
I under stand that the C-46 did not fair well in the post WWII era as a commercial transport- due to high operating costs. The C-47 was OK and then the airlines started moving to the DC-4 and DC-6. Those two- R2800 engines burned about 200 gallons per hour, so a leak would have to be big to our run the engines.
FWIW