+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Lee Enfield Cond IV

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Giove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 03:21 PM
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    258
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    08:43 PM

    Lee Enfield Cond IV

    I saw this rifle, it seem to me a bit strange. How do you think about?

    http://www.euroarms.net/ITEMS/C/CA252/CA252-4684.htm
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    67
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    02:43 PM
    I thought the conversion information was supposed to be on the left cheek (and spelled correctly)?

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Contributing Member smle addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 11:58 AM
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    493
    Real Name
    A. G.
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    01:43 PM
    Here's what mine looks like:

  5. Thank You to smle addict For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Legacy Member Giove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 03:21 PM
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    258
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    08:43 PM
    Thread Starter
    Mine too have the conversion informations on the left side.

    This is strange to me. Also date (1912) seem high.

  7. #5
    Legacy Member jrhead75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    02-03-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    354
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    12:43 PM
    This is strange to me. Also date (1912) seem high.
    Absolutely. It's already a MkIII...no need to "convert" it. At a quick glance, it looks like somebody defaced a perfectly good MkIII with spurious markings.

  8. Thank You to jrhead75 For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:38 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,545
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    09:43 PM
    I would agree entirely. I have had a few Cond MkIV's over the years & all of the charger bridges differ a little from those as fitted as standard on MkIII's in that they project down a little lower than the ejector screw, being recessed a little to clear it. You can see in the photo that the charger bridge on the shown rifle finishes above the level of the ejector, typical of a factory produced MkIII.

  10. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Legacy Member Giove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 03:21 PM
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    258
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    08:43 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thank you all.

    Roger: my ConD IV (Enfield 1908), a 1894 BSA Mk II, has the same charger bridge like the one in the link (with no project down).

    This firm is the one who bought the italian navy Lee-Enfield. I don't know if this rifle is one of those: I am doubtfull. I asked them some informations, including this. When I get the answer, I'll, promptly, let you know.

  12. #8
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:38 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,545
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    09:43 PM
    Thanks giove. That's the first time I've heard of a cond MkIV like that......interesting. Keep us posted if you manage to find out any more.

  13. #9
    Legacy Member Giove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 03:21 PM
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    258
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    08:43 PM
    Thread Starter
    Crazy thing! I am a bit confused.

    The company told me that the rifle was in the lot of the "italian navy", and, given their seriousness, I can only believe them.

    It seems to be an original!

    The stock isn't serialized.

    Your opinions are very welcome.

  14. #10
    Legacy Member Giove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 03:21 PM
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    258
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    08:43 PM
    Thread Starter
    Photos of the marks:

    - Deleted Sale mark;
    - Also Lithgowicon inspection marks.
    Last edited by Giove; 07-07-2017 at 05:44 AM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The restoration of a Cond. IV .22
    By Roy in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-03-2017, 07:24 PM
  2. ConD II* Question
    By Roy in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-16-2014, 03:49 PM
  3. No. 2 MK. IV* / Former ShtLE Mk. IV ConD
    By MVolkJ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-11-2014, 07:43 AM
  4. Enfield 1907 COND 11*
    By RCS in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-26-2012, 01:44 AM
  5. Cond IV advice needed
    By KimW in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-24-2010, 05:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts