CDN 2013 mk8 in a T?

[jonh172]

Aside from the trajectory not matching the drums on the scope is there any reason I shouldn't use 2013 CDN made mk8 ammo in my T?

Found a great article on Enfield Rifles.com explain8ng how all mk8 isnt made equal and it encouraged me.
But still like to hear what everyone here has to say.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[tiriaq]

You are referring to the IVI made Ranger issue ammunition? No reason not to use it. Good non-corrosive Boxer primed ammunition. It isn't Mk. 8 machinegun ammunition, if that is what you are wondering.

[jonh172]

You are referring to the IVI made Ranger issue ammunition? No reason not to use it. Good non-corrosive Boxer primed ammunition. It isn't Mk. 8 machinegun ammunition, if that is what you are wondering.

Yes thats the stuff!

Whats it loaded with?

[browningautorifle]

IVI made Ranger issue ammunition

Absolutely, that was why they made it. Made to shoot in #4 rifles...turn it to empty brass...

Whats it loaded with?

They'll never let that info out.

[bros]

You are referring to the IVI made Ranger issue ammunition? No reason not to use it. Good non-corrosive Boxer primed ammunition. It isn't Mk. 8 machinegun ammunition, if that is what you are wondering.

We Rangers are currently issued soft point ammo.......not ball anymore. From my experience I was able to get better groupings through my various Enfields with the ball than the soft point.

[jonh172]

Ill pull a bullet and see.

Thanks guys!

[jonh172]

This stuff

[tiriaq]

Yes, that is the Ranger issue ball.

[Brian Dick]

The only real difference is the boat tail projectile vs the Mk.7 flat base. As long as your throat erosion isn't extreme from the use of cordite, it should shoot fine.

[jonh172]

Nice, thanks guys!