+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: No.1 MkIII WWII dispersal rifles

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member twh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:45 PM
    Posts
    156
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 AM

    No.1 MkIII WWII dispersal rifles

    Here are a couple of photos of my two dispersal rifles. One came from a gun show several years ago and the second from an auction last weekend.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to twh For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member Brian B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 12:28 AM
    Location
    ALTADENA, CA
    Posts
    360
    Real Name
    Brian Brown
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    05:22 AM
    Thanks for sharing!!

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Giove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 03:14 AM
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    256
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 PM
    The first and the second year. Well done.


    Inviato dal mio 2201117SY utilizzando Tapatalk

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    05-24-2024 @ 03:13 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,442
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 PM
    I've often wondered whether at least some of the BSA c1937-40, & early dispersal factory rifles may have been assembled from 'left over' Great War components. Rifles made at BSA Small Heath in the late '30's & 1940 tend also to show the phenomenon of the last two digits of the date of mfr being hand stamped. These do too, although I suspect the old bunters were either modified by grinding to remove all but the 'B' of BSA, the last two date digits, & so on, or new bunters appropriate for the dispersal factory rifles were made, presumably with the date again just left as '19 X X'. The 1940 rifle shows clear evidence of the butt socket being linished before the new markings were applied, so could just possibly be a recycled WW1 body. They make an interesting study in their own right.....

  7. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 07:40 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,547
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    I've often wondered whether at least some of the BSA c1937-40, & early dispersal factory rifles may have been assembled from 'left over' Great War components. Rifles made at BSA Small Heath in the late '30's & 1940 tend also to show the phenomenon of the last two digits of the date of mfr being hand stamped. These do too, although I suspect the old bunters were either modified by grinding to remove all but the 'B' of BSA, the last two date digits, & so on, or new bunters appropriate for the dispersal factory rifles were made, presumably with the date again just left as '19 X X'. The 1940 rifle shows clear evidence of the butt socket being linished before the new markings were applied, so could just possibly be a recycled WW1 body. They make an interesting study in their own right.....

    It is known that in the second wave of dispersal rifles (in early 1945) they certainly used 'pre-used' parts and 'refreshed' earlier built rifles.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  9. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    05-24-2024 @ 03:13 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,442
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 PM
    I'd read about that before, re the late rifles, but I can't recall seeing anything definitive about the early ones. (But then again my appalling memory is well known!). BSA were the second largest producer of SMLE's during the Great War & also carried on producing & refurbing during the inter-war period, as orders came in, so I suppose they may well have had quantities of parts to hand....

  10. #7
    Legacy Member 82Trooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Last On
    05-23-2024 @ 06:41 PM
    Location
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania USA
    Posts
    194
    Real Name
    Mike Rakow
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    If I may ask....what does the term "dispersal" rifle reference?
    "Audacia....By daring deed"

  11. Thank You to 82Trooper For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 07:40 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,547
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by 82Trooper View Post
    If I may ask....what does the term "dispersal" rifle reference?
    Dispersal Rifles

    Up until 1940, BSA made normal high-quality No1 MkIII* on limited military contracts, marked with the usual Crown and BSA&Co, as well as identical rifles just marked "BSA&Co" for commercial sale and export.
    With the invasion scare, the Ministry of Supply ordered BSA to make rifles out of whatever parts it could get together. Hence the rifles were made of mixtures of commercial and military parts, mixed walnut and beech wood (or all-beech), later on No4 butts and firing pin/cocking pieces. A second wave of production in 1945 even used recycled and re-dated receivers.
    About the same time the emergency rifle production was started, BSA was ordered to disperse its many Birmingham factories away from the bomb-target central area, and also to increase war production by diluting experienced staff with war staff. BSA was a huge engineering group, and this "Dispersal" programme led to 70 seperate factories being set up, moved and/or expanded. Rifle production involved several of these factories (both No1s and No4s), and this type of "all available parts" No1 has become known as a "Dispersal rifle". Technically, even the No4s were Dispersals, as well as motorbikes, bicycles, aircraft parts, machine guns and heavy weaponry...
    BSA marked these rifles with just the first "B" of BSA&Co. Presumably this was to dissociate the company from these slightly less-than top quality peacetime rifles!
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  13. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Legacy Member 82Trooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Last On
    05-23-2024 @ 06:41 PM
    Location
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania USA
    Posts
    194
    Real Name
    Mike Rakow
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    thank you for taking the time to respond.
    "Audacia....By daring deed"

  15. #10
    Legacy Member Charlie303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last On
    05-21-2024 @ 04:23 PM
    Location
    Somerset, UK
    Posts
    172
    Real Name
    Charles
    Local Date
    05-26-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 PM
    1942 SMLE III* Dispersal Rifle.















    4 groove barrel. Did other Enfields have them?

  16. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Charlie303 For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dispersal rifles marking and cutoff
    By bob4wd in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-18-2015, 06:17 AM
  2. Why did LSA make No1 MkIII rifles throughout WWI?
    By Surpmil in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-13-2013, 01:51 AM
  3. Why there aren't Japanese rifles among "favorite WWII rifles"?
    By blackcat_attilio in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 04-06-2011, 10:54 PM
  4. WWII & the No.1 MkIII* vs. No.4 MkI*
    By P-07ShortLee in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 04:45 PM
  5. Comparing the Lee Enfield No.1 MkIII* and Mauser K98k Rifles
    By Badger in forum The Screening Room
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-31-2007, 09:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts