1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member SRiverrat11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    03-22-2025 @ 10:32 PM
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    241
    Real Name
    Scott
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:04 AM

    Sequential serial numbers

    I know from my reading that M1icon garand receivers did not come out sequentially. The GCAicon’s articles from the shop Forman’s notebook have shown this, but does anyone think they became more sequential the better Springfield became at manufacturing them? January 1940 produced about 3,000. By January 1944, 122,000. I would think the better the machinists and all the other workers got, the more sequential the rifles would be. Just wondering what everyone’s opinion, or research opinion would be.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,995
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:04 AM
    I would think you're making receivers and before hardening they get a number. The whole roll mark...sequentially. I know there would be some losses but why would they not for the most part be sequential?
    Regards, Jim

  3. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:19 PM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,704
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    01:04 PM
    From what I've read, all stations used parts from bins. With heat treating being done in lots of a specific size (I forget how many went in the furnace at once. Its in hatchers notebook I think) and then put in a bin to be wheeled off to the next station, no telling what order the next guy, or the next, would pull one out. The only thing that would be sequential is the counting of the guy at the roll stamp, not the bin he pulled from and not the bin he put the stamped receiver in?

    There is a sequential pair on gunbroker selling for a premium. Someone likely got lucky in their collection.

  6. Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,995
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ssgross View Post
    The only thing that would be sequential is the counting of the guy at the roll stamp, not the bin he pulled from and not the bin he put the stamped receiver in?
    Agreed. They would assemble from bins but they still have sequential serial numbers. Not sure exactly what the OP is asking though.
    Regards, Jim

  8. #5
    Legacy Member SRiverrat11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    03-22-2025 @ 10:32 PM
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    241
    Real Name
    Scott
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:04 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    Agreed. They would assemble from bins but they still have sequential serial numbers. Not sure exactly what the OP is asking though.
    I’m asking that yes, in the early days of production, the workers would not be as experienced. The longer they did their job the better they got. Not as many mistakes would cause fewer delays, fewer delays would cause more rifles to stay in sequence.

  9. #6
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,995
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by SRiverrat11 View Post
    fewer delays would cause more rifles to stay in sequence.
    You're talking about during assembly and packing for shipping then...?
    Regards, Jim

  10. #7
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:19 PM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,704
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    01:04 PM
    https://www.americanrifleman.org/con...and-ever-made/

    I've seen a picture of a milling station for m1 garand production. Google is not cooperating with me right now in locating it, which means it's likely in a book somewhere. Someone with a better memory will likely beat me to finding it. Anyway, the guy has a box - more like a large crate, with receivers in it. There is no organization in the crate. just a loose jumble.
    If you are asking about very early days while production was still being set up and troubleshooted, I would think the lots would have been smaller quantities as fixtures and processes at a each station were refined and tuned. I recall description/discussion of the challenge of setting all this up in one of hatcher's books.

  11. Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,995
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ssgross View Post
    milling station for m1 garand production
    Still, the receivers were stamped with ID after that, just before any heat treat and Parkerizing. Then you see them carried on a different rig with pegs. Parkerizing came after barrel installation at least in the beginning. I wouldn't think they would necessarily be in order though when they were rolled around on those big mobile racks with inspection tags. They would end up moving around and then when crated...they could be in any order.

    But the whole thing of the OPs thread, I thought was talking about they missed numbers or returned receivers so some numbers didn't actually make it out of the factory...
    Regards, Jim

  13. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:19 PM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,704
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    01:04 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    I wouldn't think they would necessarily be in order though when they were rolled around on those big mobile racks with inspection tags.
    Agreed. Unless they had interns to torture by having them sort to put them back in order for assemble

    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifle View Post
    But the whole thing of the OPs thread, I thought was talking about they missed numbers or returned receivers so some numbers didn't actually make it out of the factory...
    There has been a series of articles in the GCAicon journal these last many issues about a handwritten notebook detailing this very topic.

  15. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  16. #10
    Advisory Panel
    Rick B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-23-2025 @ 09:17 AM
    Location
    Hinckley, Ohio
    Posts
    510
    Real Name
    RICHARD BORECKY
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    01:04 PM
    I had Winchester serial # 101660 and it had the 7th round stop cut out. That was only seen on very early Winchesters and stopped around 100200 That would mean it was an earlier receiver that was serialed later. Rick Bicon





  17. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Rick B For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-21-2022, 02:30 PM
  2. Serial numbers
    By Chili501 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-29-2020, 06:19 PM
  3. 1903A4 serial numbers vs m73b1 serial
    By Live4therut in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-03-2017, 10:57 AM
  4. low serial numbers
    By Bezoar in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-06-2014, 12:31 PM
  5. 03-A4 Serial Numbers
    By Johnny Peppers in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-02-2011, 09:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts