-
Advisory Panel
Semper Fi, Scarface! Went to Quantico a couple of weeks ago. It has changed, but not too much. Saw a lot of officers jogging with artificial legs (half a dozen or so - IED's?). I guess the Corps changed their policy on amputees. They should have.
Jim
*********************************
"Me. All the rest are deados!"
67th Company, 5th Marines 1st Sgt. Daniel "Pop" Hunter's response to 1st Lt. Jonas Platt's query "Who is your Commander"?, Torcy side of Hill 142, Belleau Wood, 8:00 am, 6 Jun 1918.
Semper Fidelis!

-
-
05-16-2010 02:58 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Guys, all of you all- Viet Nam Vets? Anybody smelled gun smoke in the morning? Armchair commados? I carried an M16
as I wanted to set the example. I was wounded one night and was in the field the next day. Officers and NCO's set the example, sorry but you combat vets know this true. Sgt York also set the example. Shaved, clean and he didn't stink. OK? Got it? So what weapon do you guess he carried? M1917, yes. He set the example. I was an Advisor in RVN and we carried ANYTHING we wanted. Just as long it was in the field. OK??? Again, I carried an M16.
-
-
-
Sgt York (movie) sidearm
To add more confusion...
(Or maybe just add to Hollywood's contributions to authenticity)
In the movie, Sgt York used a 1903 and also picked off several Germans with a Luger.
I've read that 'Sgt York' used a Luger in movie version, only because they had a Luger set up that would cycle consistently firing blanks. From what I read (long ago) was they had a M1911 that was supposed to be used in the movie but it didn't function consistently firing blanks, so they used the Luger they had on set that happened to function better.
(Only what I read!)
-
-
Legacy Member
The movie was just that, a movie. Very few movies honestly depict war. "Porkchop Hill", not bad, "Saving Pvt Ryan" was OK, but the concept was weak. Just hard to make a war movie that is honest. Hollywood has very few vets in the industry, only after WWII were any vets around.
-
Thank You to Calif-Steve For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
My opinion (not much) is kinda like what Steve said. York didn't think of himself as anything special, and I doubt he acted like it. I'm sure he thought if he was given a m1917 to use, than it was for a reason, and he used it.
Besides, it has better combat sights than a 1903 and it holds an extra round, if you want it to. I think a guy like York would grow to appreciate those things.
-
-

Originally Posted by
Calif-Steve
The movie was just that, a movie. Very few movies honestly depict war. "Porkchop Hill", not bad, "Saving Pvt Ryan" was OK, but the concept was weak. Just hard to make a war movie that is honest. Hollywood has very few vets in the industry, only after WWII were any vets around.
Hi Steve,
Have you ever seen 'Battleground' made just after WWII?
I'm not sure of the authenticity of all the facts, but the GI's in the movie acted more like you'd think real GI's would act.
(I love that movie, regardless)
The GI's were scared and miserable, but they fought anyway, more for their buddies than a noble cause, and they griped etc throughout the movie.
~ Harlan
Last edited by Harlan (Deceased); 05-19-2010 at 11:15 AM.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
York
I have read reference by Mr. Alvin York that they had the " English" rifle. Could this have been in reference to the M 1917 or the SMLE?? I have read that excavation of the site where the famous action occurred is currently underway or has been recently completed. Does any one have more info ??
-
Legacy Member
I lost the original post of this thread while trying to edit it, so I'm going to try to type it out again as I remember it. There was a man who wrote to the National RIfle Association about something that his father had told him years before. His father, a member of York's platoon, had been admitted to a field hospital near the front just before York earned his reputation taking out the German
Machine guns. York visited the man the day before where the man was having his wound treated. Upon leaving, York asked if he could take the man's 1903 Springfield and did so with the man's permission. The 1903 was one of several that had been taken earlier by a man or couple of men who saw them in stacks behind a mess tent. When nobody was around or looking, The man or men grabbed an arm load of Springfields and took off with them back to their platoon. The hospitalized man told his son that until his visit from York at the hospital that day, York had used a 1917 Enfield. He said that York had been growing fond of the 1903's for awhile while observing the several in the posession of the men who had disgarded their 1917's for them earlier. The man told his son that he believed that the rifle that York left the hospital with that day was very likely the same one that he used in his exploits. The man's son had never forgotten what his father had told him and upon reading of York's heroic story in an American Rifleman, was reminded of what his father had said. The National Rifle Association listed the details of the story in one of their American Rifleman magazines where I read it. In response to anyone who insists that a well trained soldier of that time wouldn't have stolen rifles or weapons in that manner or used another type other than what he was issued, I have to tell you here and now that that just ain't necessarily so in every case. Personal experience there. Also, My grandpa's best friend, Fred Smith who went to war as an infantryman in WWI, told my gramps that the men who served with him, whenever they came across a 1903 Springfield, would drop their Enfields and pick up the Springfield. Gramps was proud of the fact that he'd qualified as an Expert Rifleman with the 1903 during the war and thought highly of it. I guess that Fred Smith and many others did too, in spite of the better battle sights of the 1917.
Here's a picture of my grandpa, James Mett Shippee, in 1917 at Camp Logan, Great Lakes Naval Training Center before he shipped off to the North Sea on the U.S.
S. Wadsworth.
Last edited by Fred G.; 05-26-2010 at 11:15 AM.
-
-
Advisory Panel
That's very intersting, and it remains only to be confirmed that US soldiers took their rifles with them when they went into hospital. And that only because I don't know myself of course.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
Legacy Member
Beats me what the circumstances were of that man's admittance into the field hospital. Maybe he just walked back there and took his rifle with him, was ordered to remain and there he stayed. Could've been an infected wound that required treatment. I'm going to throw in with the account though. Something about it rings of the truth to me. If accurate, it explains what York was doing with a 1903 on that particular day. By the way, as per the information in Yorks personal diary, the serial number of his 1911 was 254648. It too was stolen from him while he was on the transport ship coming home.
Last edited by Fred G.; 05-26-2010 at 12:49 AM.
-