-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
05-10-2009 12:18 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Dmitre, that IMI banoleer´s a b*gger. Friend ordered one and it had to be re-sewn (at great expense) so that the rounds fit. Must have been made somewhere in China.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Interesting thats the 2nd time I have been told something is wrong with IMA, I guess I wont recommend their reproductions again. 
Dimitri
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
survivalofthefit
Yea, im gona venture a guess that the 2$ ones are the canvas fabric ones, not the leather ones which fetch a much higher price....they do play dress up with the 1905 style leather bandoleers
You are correct, they are the standard cloth bandoliers issued to and used by all British
and Commonwealth troops during the No.4 era. True, some leather bandoliers may have been used on occasion in WW2, maybe some rare South African cavalry units at home in SA, but they did not see combat use during WW2 or the remainder of "the No.4 era.".
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
gew8805
You are correct, they are the standard cloth bandoliers issued to and used by all
British
and Commonwealth troops during the No.4 era. True, some leather bandoliers may have been used on occasion in WW2, maybe some rare South African cavalry units at home in SA, but they did not see combat use during WW2 or the remainder of "the No.4 era.".
I have in my collection a five pocket leather bandolier marked U Broad Arrow (South Africa) and dated 1942.