+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Student Mentions CCW in Class Presentation, Prof Calls Cops

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    kcw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-27-2009 @ 10:40 PM
    Posts
    53
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    06:22 AM

    How things have changed

    Quote Originally Posted by SoCal M1icon Shooter View Post
    The Volokh Conspiracy - Professor Files Complaint With Police Based on College Student's Class Presentation in Favor of Concealed Carry:

    Sometimes it's hard not to wish ill on someone, especially someone like the professor in this story. Yet I find myself wondering-- without actually wishing ill, mind you-- how this dumb, mean-spirited lib might change her outlook if she experienced a hot break-in at 3:00 a.m. one morning.
    How things have changed! Back in 71' I was taking a public speaking course as part of my studies @ a state college in NY (SUNY). The policy at the time was that you couldn't have guns on campus without the permission of the dean or chief of campus police.
    For the "demonstrative" section of the course I wanted to demonstrate how to change a gun. I was granted permission by the dean, who then immediately informed campus security and told them that I would be bringing the gun on campus on a certain date and time. The restrictions placed upon me were: no live ammo, gun to be kepted cased at all times; other than during the demo and it I had a 20 minute time frame, before and after class, to move it onto and off campus. The entire permission thing took all of 2 minutes, no paperwork. The whole thing went off without a hitch and I got an A for the project (the prof really liked my "attention getter". I started out by saying that "the most important thing about gun cleaning is to make certain it's unloaded" Upon saying the word "unloaded"I racked out a dummy round which flew across the room and made everyone wake up.)
    In today's climate I'd probably end up in jail just for asking to bring on gun on campus.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Hap Rocketto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-11-2010 @ 02:12 PM
    Posts
    9
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    06:22 AM
    This article is bylined Maxim Lott from Fox News

    A professor in Connecticut reported one of her students to the police after he gave a class presentation on why students and teachers should be allowed to carry concealed weapons on campus. Now, free speech activists say the professor’s actions are what really need to be investigated.

    Last October, John Wahlberg and two classmates at Central Connecticut State University gave an oral presentation for a communications class taught by Professor Paula Anderson. The assignment was to discuss a “relevant issue in the media,” and the students presented their view that the death toll in the April 2007 Virginia Tech shooting massacre would have been lower if professors and students had been carrying guns.

    That night, police called Wahlberg, a 23-year-old senior, and asked him to come to the station. When he arrived, they they read off a list of firearms that were registered in his name and asked where he kept them. Guns are strictly prohibited on the CCSU campus and residence halls, but Wahlberg says he lives 20 miles off-campus and keeps his gun collection locked up in a safe. No further action was taken by police or administrators.

    “I don’t think that Professor Anderson was justified in calling the CCSU police over a clearly non-threatening matter,” Wahlberg told The Recorder, the CCSU student newspaper that first reported the story. “Although the topic of discussion may have made a few individuals uncomfortable, there was no need to label me as a threat.”

    Wahlberg declined to comment further to FOXNews.com, saying he did not want more media attention.

    According to The Recorder, Anderson cited safety as her reason for calling the police. “It is also my responsibility as a teacher to protect the well-being of our students, and the campus community at all times,” she told The Recorder. “As such, when deemed necessary because of any perceived risks, I seek guidance and consultation from the Chair of my Department, the Dean and any relevant University officials.”

    Anderson did not respond to calls from FOXNews.com. Campus police forwarded requests to university spokesman Mark McLaughlin, who declined to comment, citing Wahlberg’s privacy.

    Robert Shibley, vice president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), said Anderson's actions appeared to be out of line.
    “If all he did was discuss reasons for allowing guns on campus, it seems a bit much to call the police and grill him about it,” Shibley said. “If you go after students for just discussing an idea, that goes against everything a university is supposed to stand for.”

    Shibley said FIRE has seen many more cases of hair-trigger responses by administrators over anything gun-related since the Virginia Tech shooting.
    In 2007, Shibley noted, a student at Hamline University in Minnesota was suspended after writing a letter to an administrator arguing that carrying concealed weapons on campus may help prevent tragedies like the one at Virginia Tech. The student was allowed to return only after undergoing a psychological evaluation, he said.

    Shibley also cited an incident at Colorado College last year in which campus administrators denounced a flyer as "threatening and demeaning content" because it mentioned guns. He said the students who produced the flyer were found guilty of violating the school’s violence policy, which was added to their school records.

    “It is, of course, important that administrators identify real threats to students,” Shibley said. “But they need to use logic to discern whether a threat is real.”

    But Jerold Duquette, an associate professor of political science at CCSU who sits on the Faculty Senate Committee on Academic Freedom, say the Wahlberg case is not so clear-cut. “This is a situation where both sides can come up with a reasonable explanation,” Duquette said.

    “[Wahlberg] certainly has a reason to complain, since he didn’t do anything directly threatening. But I wouldn’t say the administration has a reason to sanction or punish the professor or the police.... I don’t know if I would have done anything differently in the situation.”

    Katie Kasprzak, a spokeswoman for the group Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, suggested that the professor called the police because she disagreed with Wahlberg’s political views. "Critics of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus argue that colleges and universities are dedicated to the free flow of ideas,” she said. “Yet when a student gives a class presentation on a relevant issue in the media, it is acceptable to label the student as a threat? The only threat posed was a threat to the professor’s personal beliefs.”

    Duquette said there was no evidence to support that. “I think a lot of people see this as a liberal professor going after a student because he likes guns. I don’t know if that’s the case,” Duquette said, adding that more would need to be known about the incident.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    limazulu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-31-2011 @ 09:27 PM
    Posts
    114
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    06:22 AM
    According to The Recorder, Anderson cited safety as her reason for calling the police. “It is also my responsibility as a teacher to protect the well-being of our students, and the campus community at all times,” she told The Recorder.

    If she wants to protect the students she should carry a gun.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. F-Class?
    By sdh1911 in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-19-2008, 09:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts