-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
jmoore
I poked around looking for a barreled action with a gap (Mostly Indian rifles) to photograph, but couldn't find one in the pile. Anybody have a visual aid?
was heading down to check when I finish reading...
-
Thank You to Son For This Useful Post:
-
09-24-2012 04:22 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:
-

Originally Posted by
5thBatt
Here's the gap on my 1923 EFD Mkv SMLE
Overall it looks fairly small, but is it consistant? In the first shot it looks 0.010" or less.
Good visual aid!
And on a rifle built during a "quiet time" when the production pressures were low.
-
-
Contributing Member
Well Theodore, if you have'nt got your answer yet, there is none.
The forum with the resident armchair collector has locked this thread, let's all just leave it at that.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
muffett.2008
Well Theodore, if you have'nt got your answer yet, there is none.
The forum with the resident armchair collector has locked this thread, let's all just leave it at that.

Amen to that.
-
-
Legacy Member
Gap between barrel and receiver
He was making my eyes bleed!
-
Thank You to gsimmons For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
muffett.2008
Well Theodore, if you have'nt got your answer yet, there is none.
The forum with the resident armchair collector has locked this thread, let's all just leave it at that.

did Lithgow
make armchairs?
I don't have one with a noticeable gap, but take my hat off to 5thBatt. Thats a great example of what the sav said cannot happen!
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
jmoore
Overall it looks fairly small, but is it consistant? In the first shot it looks 0.010" or less.
Good visual aid!
And on a rifle built during a "quiet time" when the production pressures were low.
jmoore, the gap is consistant & appears to go all the way to the thread, here's a photo to compare.
-
-
Legacy Member
SMLE breeching data:
According to drawing No. A.I.D. 1318. to accompany S.A. 435A, the pertinent dimensions are thus:
From receiver front face to forward face of inner breech ring: 0.681" Accept, 0.689" Reject.
From absolute end of barrel to shoulder of Knox form: 0.6911".
Thus, under any acceptable gauging, there should be a SMALL gap between the front of the receiver / body (or "shoe" if you prefer REALLY old Snider-vintage parlance) and the rear of the Knox Form. Therefore, SMLEs are INTERNALLY breeched, like a Mauser 98.
When I get a few hours spare, I will dive into the crypt and dig out the relevant numbers for the No4.
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Here are a couple more
First, one full turn out.
Second, a gap of about 1mm.

-
Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post: