-
Advisory Panel
mazak
and Zamak = good old pot metal!
-
Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:
-
01-12-2014 08:55 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
mazak
and Zamak = good old pot metal!
They looked good when they were new, I still preferred the brass though.
-
-
-
Advisory Panel
They work fine but will crack/break with rough use. The brass buttplates were pretty much indestructible.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
If it is a British
WWII manufacturer's code, M.16 was Bullers Ltd.,Tipton, Staff.

Originally Posted by
Lee Enfield
I've never seen a 1944 dated BSA 'T' that has a split foresight block.
Mind you that's only a few dozen....
My other 1945 dated BSA 'T' has a split front sight block.
My Brit 'T's are pretty evenly split between brass and zinc butt plates.
My Long Branch 'T's are split between steel and zinc.
Any idea who or what "M/16" was?
. <<<<<<<<<<#####%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Seaforth72
If it is a
British
WWII manufacturer's code, M.16 was Bullers Ltd.,Tipton, Staff.
. <<<<<<<<<<#####%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
It's not "Bullers Ltd." as the forend is "Fazakerly 1956" (F56) dated.
M over 16 is marked on it, I believe it is the fitter who restocked the rifle during it's service life.
-