-
Legacy Member
krag bayonet value
I am trying to match a bayonet to my 1898 Krag
, linked to the 26th. US infantry. I have two bayonets, a 1900 and a 1902. Condition aside which would be a better match for the rifle ?
( the 1902 is in slightly better shape ,grip area)
-Thanks, Kab
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
04-05-2015 01:18 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
They're both the same pattern, yes? The rivets are the dome type? And the only difference other than a bit of condition is the date stamp... When a rifle is issued, any bayonet that's in stores will do. The list includes them by name, you won't likely get one that's exactly new, you might... If the scabbard is second pattern and bayonet is too...I'd use the best one. Now, how about some pics?
Here's something borrowed from Gunboards, in 2008...dfariswheel said...
The question is often asked about whether a specific rifle would have had a certain type of sling or model of bayonet, or what was the "official" cleaning gear that would have been issued at a certain time.
The president of my first gun club was an old Ordnance man who'd served from the 1913 Mexican affair to Korea. He told me that what you were issued depended entirely on what the ordnance shed had when you showed up. The "official" sling may have been a 1907 or a canvas M1
rifle sling, but if the Ordnance shed only had Kerr slings in stock..... you got a Kerr sling.
Same thing applied to bayonets, cleaning gear, cartridge belts and everything else. If it came between not having the "official" issue item to issue or issuing NOTHING, they issued what they had.
Last edited by browningautorifle; 04-05-2015 at 09:58 PM.
Regards, Jim
-
-
-
Legacy Member
thanks
Thanks, Jim. Thought you would have the answer. Will post pictures as soon as I can. The scabbard is the type 3. Probably to link the bayonet to a conflict I will have to use the 1900.
-
-
Legacy Member
Krag bayonet pics(I hope)
httphttps://www.milsurps.com/images/tacticalgamer/attach/jpg.gif://www.milsurps.com/images/tachttps://www.milsurps.com/images/tacticalgamer/attach/jpg.giftichttps://www.milsurps.com/images/tacticalgamer/attach/jpg.https://www.milsurps.com/images/tact...attach/jpg.gif
-
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Jim, Why would I take anything wrong ? I asked for your opinion. Thanks for the tip. I know someone did a bad sharpening job. Fortunately I'm not a collector, just an admirer of US military firearms.
Speaking of Canada
I miss the good old days when I could just drive to the Eastern Townships with a couple of 03's in the trunk and target shoot with my fiends from McGill. Guess those days are done.
-thanks, Kab
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
kablair
the Eastern Townships
You don't hear them referred to that way much any more. My woman is from Coaticook. Yes, everything there has changed to rigid. No one shoots just where they want to any more. I originally came from down southern Ontario, Leamington/Wheatley area and Brian Dick
was a bit east of me... Of course Badger is from the big town...
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
actually the scabbard might be more important than the blade in some instances to a collector , but as you are in the later era rifle its not very critical either to your choice , the picket pin case aside the latest version of the scabbard would have worked best with the current ammo belts at that point , an 1899 blade would have been contemporary mfgr to the rifle if that helps - but if you check the stock date it could easily fit with the 1899 ,
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
A square 10
actually the scabbard might be more important than the blade in some instances to a collector
And as value goes too...I payed $75 US and after it had arrived, it was $130 CDN to me. The blade still cost that all grinder hashed and in a rat chewed picket pin case. All told it cost me $260 as is after it was hand lapped with paper and cleaned up...now it's good.
-