-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
01-17-2017 06:51 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
I'm betting it's been shortened. It's not hard to drop the finished piece into a blue tank and cover that. The rest remains the same.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I'm betting it's been shortened. It's not hard to drop the finished piece into a blue tank and cover that. The rest remains the same.
Thanks Jim. I had thought the same. Maybe an arsenal job with a problem on the crown, that was not worth counter boring or re-barreling. Going back tomorrow and see if there are any re-build marks on it.
-
Contributing Member
It's not a Mitchel's "tanker" rifle is it?
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
rum_runner
Maybe an arsenal job with a problem on the crown
No, I mean done by John Q Public. The arsenal or military will rebarrel. The rifles need to remain standard. They don't just buck'er off.
-
-
Contributing Member
I seem to recall written or mentioned somewhere that late war production of the 98's they deleted the bayonet lug also not sure if the barrel was shortened as well to expedite production as the war was not going so good for the 3rd Reich if I am incorrect I stand to be corrected.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
To the best of my knowledge No factory K98k
rifles were issued with a shortened bbl. They screwed up making a bbl they just scrapped it.
Sarge
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
CINDERS
late war production of the 98's they deleted the bayonet lug
In the struggling last era of WW2, the rifles were being produced that looked almost like a sporting rifle, a birch stock that was unfinished and unsanded...single shot and about as crude and could be done. There have been examples noted on this forum. Even those had a full length barrel though. Here's a site showing more on those... Late War . com
-