1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 03:38 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,755
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    07-04-2025
    Local Time
    12:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ssgross View Post
    I can easily get a 3-4" group off the bench with each of those.

    At 300-400 yards ?
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Today @ 12:37 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,716
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    07:09 PM
    Thread Starter
    100 yds.

  4. #13
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 03:38 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,755
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    07-04-2025
    Local Time
    12:09 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ssgross View Post
    100 yds.
    Unless the barrels are badly worn, or are not fitted and bedded properly you should be getting you should be getting half of those figures.

    Are all your screws tight ?, is the barrel lift poundage correct ? Furniture correctly fitted ?

    3"-4" at 100 yards is 6"-8" at 200 yards.
    The maximum acceptable allowance was a 6" x 6" at 200 yards.

    No 4 RIFLE TESTING
    For the No 4 Rifle, the accuracy test was the same at 100ft ten per cent of all rifles were then fired at 200 yds when six of seven shots had to fall in a rectangle 6in x 6in , the point of mean impact having to be within 3 inches of the point of aim in any direction. Ten per cent of rifles fired at 200 yds were again fired at 600 yds when 6 out of seven shots had to be in a rectangle 18 inches x 18 inches the permissible deviation of point of mean impact being 9 inches up or down, or left or right. Two per cent of rifles were fired from the shoulder, ten rounds being fed into the magazine by charger and fired rapid to test “feeding up” and ejection. After these tests the barrel was inspected to ensure that there was no expansion in the bore or chamber and that it shaded correctly from end to end. (Was not bent)


    That was the maximum, a properly assembled rifle would be around half-of that.

    With my Savage No4 Mk1, lying prone I am getting around 1MoA.
    Two warming rounds (at 10 O'Clock) and then 5 rounds

    Wind Right to Left 12-15mph, ammunition 174gr Prvi FMJ, lying prone with elbow support.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  5. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  6. #14
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Today @ 12:37 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,716
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    07:09 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks much for the quote from the standard.
    I haven't played with the bedding of either of those not-new rifles, nor have I done any load testing to tune. I don't expect much from the "target" rifle with all that cordite erosion. The other one ("Doug") saw some very wet service and the stock shows it.
    Here is my thread for the "target" rifle. https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=72890&page=1. There is a 3 shot target from 100yds towards the end, with my "test" load data, chosen only because it was from the middle of the mild data from one of my data books. It took a few trips to get this rifle on paper as the front sight was loose in it's dovetail, and was the staked type.
    Here is the thread for the other rifle (my first enfield, and my first post on milsurps)...https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=69781. There is 25yd target there with a 1MOA group, but I get ~3-4" at 100yds.

  7. Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  8. #15
    Legacy Member Micheal Doyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last On
    01-22-2025 @ 05:38 PM
    Location
    Wiltshire Uk
    Posts
    398
    Real Name
    Ed Vigors
    Local Date
    07-04-2025
    Local Time
    12:09 AM
    I took a look at a could of my No4 AOL readings,
    Using BSE Mk7 bullets
    Lee Metford 3.371
    No4 Longbranch 3.375
    N4 (T) Savage (Fulton regulated) 3.175

    Using Hornady RN .312
    No4 Longbranch 3.150
    N4 (T) Savage (Fulton regulated) 2.949

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. LMG comparison
    By Luis Bren in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-04-2018, 04:54 PM
  2. The Long and Short Of Shotgun Chambers
    By Newsfeed Hound in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-02-2011, 01:40 PM
  3. I know I am starting a firestorm, but I want to know about Savage chambers
    By jdmcomp in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2011, 10:36 PM
  4. 7.62X54R Ammo Comparison
    By gandog56 in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 08:12 AM
  5. Are MG chambers bigger than other guns of
    By heckinohio in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2009, 08:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts