1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 17
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Legacy Member Scott Gahimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    353
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    10:54 AM
    There were some Colt pistols that had out-of-spec holes. The ones I am referring to were 1943 pistols and typically around 950xxx. The marks from where Colt tightened up the holes are under the finish and were done by assemblers who fitted the pistols together.

    There are numerous listings in the SRS database in that Colt serial range where pistols are listed as Defective and/or Unsafisfactory. Some pistols in these serial ranges have signs of barrels that were specifically fitted with modified lugs. I've got a couple in the 95x,xxx range.

    Later, in November 1943, the Pistol Committee recommended to the Ordnance Dept. that tolerances be relaxed a bit due to pistol rejections in the previous months and to better achieve interchangeability. At that time, Colt apparently relaxed their tolerances to the point they no longer had to number slides anymore.

    I'd say most marred surfaces seen on pistols that are done after finish could have done by anyone after the pistols left the factory...or even left the military. Those marks under the original finish are clearly marks made at the factory prior to finish being applied.

  2. Thank You to Scott Gahimer For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. 1903A1 NM Hatcher Hole, bolt hole question......
    By 218bee in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 07:24 PM
  2. U.S. Army or Marine Sniper Rifle Specs
    By mack in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-09-2009, 05:26 AM
  3. L42,No4T specs
    By trooper554877 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 10:19 AM
  4. Loading specs for 1889 Schmidt Rubins?
    By adriel in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-02-2008, 12:56 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts