Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Reality check on Cadet

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Ray P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last On
    04-30-2020 @ 03:26 AM
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    19
    Local Date
    09-20-2024
    Local Time
    03:26 AM

    Reality check on Cadet

    Well, it's been a few years in the making; mostly collecting parts, but my franken-tini is now completely assembled. I have 20 unfired cases prepped and ready to load, and I believe I've found my starting load. Just hoping y'all remind me if I've overlooked anything.

    The action is a 5-digit NSW import; modified before I got it to add a Model 12-type screw on the right side in lieu of the split pin. As-arrived, the extractor was opened for a larger caliber such as .357 or such. All parts passed a detailed cleaning & scrutiny for cracks & wear.

    Barrel is an E-Bay orphan in the original .310; straight, good threads, visible bore, no sign of a shoulder in the chamber area, and slugs out at .320. Bbl has the wider, shorter rear sight base. Pro gunsmith mounted the bbl (hell of an image). I checked headspace per Double-D's guidance: with a case in the chamber, can't slide a 0.006" feeler guage between bolt & brass. Misc parts from Numrich completed the rifle.

    Ammo will be built this week from bertram brass using cast .323" 120 gr outside heeled bullets from Buffalo Arms (same place I got the brass). Made up a dummy from one piece of brass at 1.085" caselength, and one of the bullets (thumb-fit). Dummy chambers & extracts.

    Starting load was developed on paper using Hodgdon's guidance for Trailboss; max (trimmed) case capacity without compressing powder looks to be 4.1 gr. 70% of that is 2.9gr. I'll prime (Fed SRP) today, and make up 20 rds each at 3.0gr.

    Bullet seating will be by thumb, and bullets were lubed using #7 bore butter. Much messier than pan-lubing .58 cal minies.

    Am I missing anything?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Ray P; 10-13-2010 at 09:25 AM. Reason: corrected primer type to "FED SRP" from "CCI LRP"

Similar Threads

  1. Springfield Cadet
    By green in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-30-2010, 02:52 AM
  2. Band reality check?
    By Bufordm1 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-20-2010, 02:06 PM
  3. PMA cadet with M1903
    By Rick the Librarian in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 12:31 PM
  4. A cadet and his '03 -1937
    By VeeVee in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-22-2009, 10:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts