1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 10 of 18
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Arlo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    09-26-2014 @ 01:28 AM
    Location
    Toronna
    Posts
    10
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    12:28 PM

    FrankenLithgow or Fun De-sporter? (**photos)

    I recently purchased this SMLE No 1 Mk III* 1944 Lithgowicon (see pics below). The price was right, er, seemed good at the time.

    I’d hoped I was onto one like 1944 ShtLE (Short Lee-Enfield) No.1 MkIII* Infantry Rifle, although I had no illusions that it was in quite such good shape.

    Nevertheless, it came advertised as full wood, good bore, most parts matching, shoots fine.

    On the plus side, it’s in good shape, the bore does seem very good, it cycles smoothly, the metal seems good overall (Ozzie parkerized), and the wood is pretty nice, particularly the butt stock and the front lower. Metal parts have BA and MA marks. There are a bunch of marks on the butt stock that seemed familiar and a few others elsewhere on the wood that looked promising. The handguards both looked a bit inconsistent.

    However, it turns out that pretty much nothing matches (bolt, receiver, band, nose cap, etc). The main receiver serial looks like it might be one of those US Franken-Lithgows although no recognizable importer mark. The receiver’s been drilled for a scope (anyone know what kind?) and patched and has a series of three small holes drilled (bad scope work? venting?). As well, the rear hand guard is marked DP.

    I’ve got some more research to do, and a happy ending will be that it’s perfectly functional but a bit of a mixmaster de-sporter.

    I know that I should look for recoil pads for what appears to be soft coachwood and would love to know how to check – especially if there’s a way to do without complete disassembly.

    Your thoughts most welcome. I’d appreciate any advice/deciphering from all.

    See photos for the deets:











    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Badger; 07-12-2011 at 04:34 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. 1879 Remington Lee Photos, etc. (Warning! LOTS of big photos)
    By jmoore in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-18-2018, 11:46 AM
  2. L42 Photos
    By jmoore in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 08-05-2016, 12:38 AM
  3. some photos
    By goo in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2009, 05:30 PM
  4. Playing with photos
    By TerryS in forum Military Shotguns
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 07:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts