Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: M1d dcm garand

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-11-2024 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,265
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    10:50 AM

    Fix?

    I am totally convinced that the fix was in for G&H's M1C. SA did a study of the two designs being considered and the results were plain that the D was better. Ordnance ignored the report, assuming SA was biased -- they were, but it didn't alter the fact that the C was a bit of a clunker. As early as May 1944 an Ordnance guy visited SA and told JCG he might as well quit working on his design, the contract was going to G&H. Making the C was a nightmare and kinda nuts -- they sent receivers to NYC so G&H could drill them because SA couldn't drill five holes? A turnaround time of three months? Each rifle custom fit and interchangeable only by accident? Accuracy not as good as a standard rifle? A 30% failure rate in accuracy testing? History proved SA was right, the C lasted about five years in the hands of troops, then was replaced by the D which lasted over 20 years.
    Real men measure once and cut.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bob Seijas For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts