Quote Originally Posted by Bruce McAskill View Post
The type 3 hammer could be correct. It's within about 20,000 of the start of the type 3 hammer listed by Riesch. Real nice carbine anyway you look at it.
That's the way I see it. It makes perfect sense unless it was a field change-out which may be possible? Every part on this rifle looks like they have been together since birth. Regards, Rick.