Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Enfield No.2 Mk.1 with no "*" and no hammer spur

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    07-04-2025
    Local Time
    11:28 PM

    Enfield No.2 Mk.1 with no "*" and no hammer spur

    I have only just got into researching Enfield service revolvers, and have come across a very early 30's Enfield No.2 Mk.1. There is no "*" marking. There is also no spur on the hammer (see photo), so it appears that the revolver has been modified to the No.2 Mk.1* configuration, but has not been marked accordingly. What may have led to this? Someone forgetting to put the "*" on (not very likely)? A replacement hammer? A bubba job?? The shape of the grips is consistent with No.2 Mk.1 grips, not No.2 Mk.1* grips. I am trying to find out if the revolver is SA/DA or just DA (just to be on the safe side).

    Attachment 44894

    Edit - just had it confirmed that the revolver is DA only.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by spinecracker; 07-28-2013 at 08:03 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. SAVAGE "S" in details, "ILCO butt trap", "P" on bayonet stud,what co. was ILCO?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 07:48 PM
  2. M1 Carbine Hammer Mark "UC"
    By cquickel in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-24-2009, 04:15 PM
  3. Type III hammer with "E" stamp?
    By Rick the Librarian in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-09-2009, 11:32 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts