NRA has a habit of not soliciting comment or explaining rule changes. Why should this one be any different?

CMPicon has a habit of slow-leaking on rule changes. It's been nearly three months since the NRA change and still no official position from CMP on Standing for Rapids. Why should this one be any different?

I think the "traditional" is clearer and faster if only scoring Xs, 10s, and 9s.

I'm not fully convinced on the safety claims. Just like if the X, 10, & 9 are too low, if the 6, 7, or M are too high that's what your Leatherman is for.

I can live with either scoring system; currently I'm having to live with both. So pick one already

Sometimes I just wish they'd stop stirring the $hit long enough to get through a match without a bunch of rule changes

Maury