Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Type 2 paratrooper problem

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #24
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 02:18 PM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    7,517
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    06:12 PM
    I propose that either they were all built that way or none were built that way. The war expediency doesn't cut it because they did not start producing simpler rifles until late in war and they were simply simpler construction, elimination of not needed parts, etc. Only at the very, very end were they putting together rifles that might be unsafe.

    All that being said, I think the first thing to be eliminated would be a Type 2 paratrooper rifle. They sure weren't conducting airborne operations late war and they would concentrate on the simpler straight design.

    So in my mind, that eliminates the late war expediency argument.

    As for them all being built that way, I just don't see it.

    And yes, all "kind" of a guess but when we can look at a schematic which shows it as one unit, I think that's pretty strong evidence.

  2. Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Arisaka type 2 japanese paratrooper rifle
    By Jefwil53 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-19-2013, 04:43 PM
  2. type 99 bolt problem
    By surpman1911 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-03-2013, 06:14 PM
  3. Type 99 Paratrooper
    By cary m2a in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 05-10-2009, 12:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts