Quote Originally Posted by CINDERS View Post
Why not go with a Fultons ones when you think of the time & effort to shag around with the Accumounts ones you would probably be streets ahead with a set of them is the bracket an Accumount as well Lou if it is one wonders how accurately that would be manufactured like your trying to put together a system that has untold errors which is going to eat up untold time & effort to get right if you can get it right at all.
In the current case, I thought about asking a front pad not drilled in order to fit it in place. But I guess that finally, I'm building up a look like 4T, not a perfect replica (I would have bought an original bracket and pads). So I will make a rear pad adapted to my rifle, from far, it will look like a 4 T, from a close sight, it will be definitely a scoped Lee Enfield, but I hope accurate enough for shooting at 200m.

---------- Post added at 10:50 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 AM ----------
Quote Originally Posted by tbonesmithicon View Post
While the Fulton’s mounts are pretty good, I’ve had this situation arise with them too, although to a lesser extent. I think the mistake is to expect these to fit out of the box given the range of variation on the bodies and brackets you may be fitting too.
I'm really surprised, even if you spend 120 GBP, you still get a chance to get the same error than with the Accumounts pads?