I have 4 El Paso Weaver scopes on various rifles with calibers from .22LR to 30-06. I find their optics and durability to equal new scopes that cost many times more. I guess I am a bottom feeder and cannot justify spending $800 to $2,000 for a scope to put on a $600 (or less) rifle.

To me (in my cheapskate world) what works for me is OK. I am not trying to impress anybody at the hunting camp but I think those guys with those Zeiss, Steiner, Schmidt Bender, et al, high dollar scopes and their exotic European rifles are.

Could somebody (anybody) tell me why I'm wrong??
Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.