After Action Report

[Jim Tarleton]

I posted part of a regimental After Action Report for the reading enjoyment of other forum members. I was fascinated by the protocols used by the regiment to improve combat efficiency, and thought others might be also. Norton responds by posting huge posts of nonsense completely unrelated to my post, followed by an even more nonsense about how common snipers were in the Pacific. They were as common as the T?O required them to be, but that had nothing to do with my post. He, as usual, refuses to answer a single question of his own posts. It is a cycle he always uses to avoid having to admit his frequent errors, and his motivation defies any reasonable explanation.

There was a day when this forum was replete with knowledgeable experts, like Don, Big Larry, RCS, Johnny, JB, etc.; who willingly assisted other members with their expansive knowledge. Some are still around. Norton, like a small child, is desperate to be considered an expert, and uses tactics typical of a small child to assert his will in that endeavor. Norton is a collector of documents, nothing more.

Badger, I ask that you please close this thread, as I do not wish to further contribute to a cycle without end, substance, or direction.