Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Is It Safe To

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Banned Alfred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    10-29-2009 @ 09:18 PM
    Posts
    309
    Local Date
    06-19-2025
    Local Time
    02:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim K View Post
    The metal and heat treatment of the Kragicon was the same as that of the SHT M1903; it was simply carried over from the old rifle production to the new.

    A couple of factors reduce the chance of a Krag action failing. One has been mentioned, the fully enclosed case head possible with a rimmed cartridge. Another is that the Krag operates at much lower pressures, and yet another is that Krags were not made under the kind of wartime pressure in effect at Springfield in the 1917-1918 time frame.

    I have fired many Krags, and only saw one blow. The case we removed from the chamber had the headstamp of a Germanicon 7.9 s.S round. We never learned how the shooter managed to get the round into the chamber, or if he somehow resized the case. But the rifle let go, breaking the single locking lug and spreading and cracking the receiver.

    Yes, the Krag does have a safety lug, the rear of the guide rib. On the Norwegianicon and Danishicon Krags, that lug bears so the rifle is a much stronger dual lug system. But on the U.S. Krag, that lug (for reasons unknown to me) was made to not bear and act only as a safety lug in case the front lug failed.

    Jim
    There were some European Krags chambered for the 7.92 cartridge by the Germans. I don't know if any were issued and the project is said to have been a failure, but I've read posts on European forums by owners of Krag sporters that were in 7.92, probably gunsmithed conversions or put together with leftover barrels from the German project.
    Some were saying the rifles were unsafe while others were saying they were safe. Of course European sporting ammo for the 7.92X57s and earlier J bore 8mm can be obtained in lighter pressure loadings that are for use in rifles like the Gew 1888.

    I've fired some mixed headstamp 7.92 in a Persian carbine I once owned and one round rocked me back on one heel and spun me 180 degrees, the muzzle blast was so fierce I thought the carbine had exploded, a long duration tracer flare came out of the clay bank behind the target so bright I had after images and can't say whether it was green or purple. This had to have been a special heavy loading for aircraft MGs.
    A round like that could destroy most rifles less sturdy than a Mauser 98 action, and probably some 98's.

    Theres also the Danish 8X58R. If an owner thought it was an 8mm mauser caliber rifle and managed to chamber a mauser cartridge in the much larger diameter chamber a blow out is the likely result.
    Last edited by Alfred; 06-29-2009 at 05:04 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Gun Safe Advice Needed
    By mqstevens in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-24-2009, 07:28 PM
  2. Protecting Safe Queens
    By vp146b4 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 11:12 PM
  3. Rack For Safe
    By stonewall56 in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-23-2009, 01:34 PM
  4. How safe is Milsurp?
    By OGDRAGON55 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-29-2008, 08:42 PM
  5. Safe 7.62x54R for 1895 Winchester
    By kevin.303 in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-06-2007, 07:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts