Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: M1903 USMC Sights?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Deceased May 2nd, 2020 Cosine26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-18-2020 @ 07:29 PM
    Location
    Cal
    Posts
    506
    Local Date
    06-22-2024
    Local Time
    11:52 PM

    M1903 USMC Sights?

    Rhetorical Question
    I would wonder if the stringent definition of the M1903 “service” rifle in the 20’s and 30’s caused the demise of the M1903 USMC sights.
    The Individual Rifle Match and the Team Rifle Match was a matter of pride and was the subject of fierce competitiveness among the services (the Army, The USMC, the Navy and the Coast Guard) and among the various army teams (Infantry, Cavalry and Engineers). Competition between the USMC and the Infantry was always a very hard fought battle. Regulations required that these be fired with the “service” rifle. There was also at one time a 300 yard rapid fire match that required use of the battle sight. It would seem to me that the Marines would have difficulty establishing a winning Class A team while switching back and forth between the USMC sight and the service sight. As I remember reading the regulation, a Class A team required that 30% of the team members be “new” shooters. “New” shooters were defined as those who had not previously fired in the National Matches. Experienced shooters could probably accommodate the switch but new shooters may find it a bit more difficult.
    How stringent were the regulations? Let me cite a couple of examples.
    When the headless cocking piece and the reverse safety were discontinued, a notice appeared in the American Rifleman from the DCM which authorized their continued use in the National Matches on the “service” rifle.
    In the middle 1930’s a notice was published in the American Rifleman where the DCM authorized rifles that were “drilled and tapped” for the Lyman 48 (with the Lyman 48 removed) were to be considered to be in the service rifle configuration .
    The NB style NM rifle was not authorized for use as a service rifle even though it was NM except for the Style B stock, even after the Type C Stock had been authorized. Also the Special Target NM was not authorized for use as a “service “rifle.
    Just wondering?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to Cosine26 For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. M1903 art
    By Liam in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-13-2009, 11:43 AM
  2. USMC Sights Pic?
    By DMark in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-30-2009, 06:59 AM
  3. USMC M1903 Is Chambering!!
    By paratrpr in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-28-2009, 07:05 PM
  4. USMC sights for the 1903
    By HiredGun in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 08:08 AM
  5. M1903 Nm
    By colwhelen in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-06-2009, 08:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts