I just cut the chamber deeper on a Super Match from SA Inc that I had to do a light rebuild on. It has about 20 rounds through it. I rebuilt it because it had excessive windage when a mechanical zero was set (about 3 minutes plus at 300 yards). I found that the barrel was indexed in about 1.5 degrees too far and while I had the rifle apart, after re-indexing the barrel correctly, decided that I really should check the headspace even though it was probably ok, especially since I indexed the barrel farther outward, which should lengthen the chamber..not much, but it's certainly not going to be the same length, or shorter, in any case. Well, with a Clymer .308 Go Gage in the rifle, the bolt lug would not drop all the way down to touch the locking lug recess. It looked to be about .001" short of headspace (approximately). I thought "how could that get out of the shop?". Well, I thought, because maybe nothing was wrong when the technician cut the chamber and assembled it (sort of). I thought, if the gage used said it was good, even if it wasn't, who would know that it really was short of headspace? Well, nobody that checked it with the same gage, or same type would know. SA Inc. can normally tell you on the tag that the rifle leaves the shop with, if the chamber is 1.630, 1.631, 1.632, etc. The only company I know of that has headspace gages ready made in .001 intervals is Forster. Maybe one can draw a conclusion here, maybe not. When I reamed the chamber with my headspacing reamer which I bought from Dave Manson, it took a bit of cutting to get the bolt to drop all the way down. In fact, I had to switch from the .250 thrust bushing to the .251 that I bought from Dave recently When I did the first bit of cutting with the .251 bushing, it just went a bit beyond dropping all the way down. I think if I would have let the reamer spin a bit with the .250 bushing in place, that would have been just enough to let the bolt drop all the way, but I didn't try that. I can see that the reamer and thrust bushings seem to correspond pretty closely to each other, but none of that equipment corresponded closely to what came out of SA Inc. and should have been proper headspace. I'd really like to know what SA Inc. is using for headspace gauges.
Very interesting,
Danny