1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Lt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2016 @ 05:26 PM
    Posts
    99
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:07 PM

    03 bolt markings opinions requested

    Purchased 2 odd 03 bolts at a local show . 2 complete bolts one marked WL3 which carries a late electro arced number 1511395 under the extractor . The other is a J6 and carries a 1513367 number also under the extractor with CV marked striker knob .The number scribing are from a fine hand . Finish is a dark black blue.. Not Greek oxide . Am I correct the above scribed serial numbers would have been in the 1938 or 39 pre war era ? . According to Vics chart the rifles with mid to late 30s serial numbers should have NS marked bolts .These are small gas hole bolts . Pic of the WL3 enclosed .Wondering which branch would marry old bolts with late rifles ?? Opinions cherished . Thanks LT
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel John Beard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    06-08-2025 @ 12:22 AM
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    1,098
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    08:07 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Lt1 View Post
    Am I correct the above scribed serial numbers would have been in the 1938 or 39 pre war era ?
    You are correct.


    Quote Originally Posted by Lt1 View Post
    Wondering which branch would marry old bolts with late rifles ??
    The USMC.

    J.B.

  3. #3
    Legacy Member Emri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-10-2022 @ 09:10 AM
    Location
    Alabama Gulf Coast
    Posts
    479
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    07:07 PM

    Yes, but.........

    Quote Originally Posted by John Beardicon View Post

    The USMC.

    J.B.

    When did the USMC begin enlarging the gas escape hole in the bolt? He stated that they were small escape hole bolts. Otherwise, I would have said they were USMC bolts.

    Please advise,

    Emri

    Nevermind, I just figured it out. You were only answering the question, not saying they were USMC bolts. The other difference I noted was the SN under the extractor rather than on top.
    Last edited by Emri; 02-23-2010 at 10:07 AM. Reason: Figured it out.

  4. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Lt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2016 @ 05:26 PM
    Posts
    99
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    09:07 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Emri View Post
    When did the USMC begin enlarging the gas escape hole in the bolt? He stated that they were small escape hole bolts. Otherwise, I would have said they were USMC bolts.

    Please advise,

    Emri

    Nevermind, I just figured it out. You were only answering the question, not saying they were USMC bolts. The other difference I noted was the SN under the extractor rather than on top.
    [QUOTE=Emri;107988]When did the USMC begin enlarging the gas escape hole in the bolt? He stated that they were small escape hole bolts. Otherwise, I would have said they were USMC bolts.

    Here is an additional early straight handle bolt from the same seller not mentioned earlier Marked BB or 13 Faint in front of the lug obviously a early bolt.Note enlarged gashole . When did the USMC enlarge holes ??? I know many rifles that were reported to be USMC have been passed on due to the absence of a hatcher hole .Question is .When did the USMC enlarge the gas hole ? It would appear some rifles escaped the mod. The receiver hole appears to be standard after late 1936

  5. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    drweiler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    02-26-2018 @ 02:54 PM
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    182
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    08:07 PM

    I have M1903 #1514292, etched bolt as well.

    An old bolt ('1'on lug, around 1909)) with large gas escape hole on a late rifle (1938) as well. These could be Marine '03's, mine came from a friend, a career Marine Officer, who acquired it after the WW11, came with 3 of the larger U.S.iconM.C. site protectors, spares etc. Semper Fi, Don

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Opinions Requested
    By JohnMOhio in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-24-2009, 03:52 PM
  2. SC 03A3 bolt markings
    By 604flyer in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 09:40 AM
  3. Need some opinions on a No. with Australian markings
    By scottlee in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2009, 03:06 PM
  4. bolt markings of 03-a3 Smith Coorona
    By duggaboy in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-01-2009, 09:05 PM
  5. Help ID bolt markings
    By colreed in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-23-2009, 04:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts