-
Legacy Member
-
Thank You to Kev G For This Useful Post:
-
02-14-2010 09:43 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
There were three (?) patterns of magazine for the EM.280 rifles and each had a complicated holding open device that beggared belief. But I think that the actual interface between them was the same (per calibre of course).
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
Peter any idea which pattern(s) of magazine were used with the .280 Bren testing/trials ?
Cheers
-
-
Haven't got a clue KG but with them all having the same interface I would assume that they'd all be in with a chance
-
-
Ok guys..pick the one that is NOT a Bren mag......

Kev: a pint at Beltring for each correct one !!! :-)##
-
-
Deceased August 2nd, 2014
Last one on the right
I would venture that it's the last one on the upper row(from the LEFT)
What's happenin' in Soodberry ? Anything coming out of the stacks yet ??
Cheers,JR
-
Legacy Member
Judging by scaling up the pictures the top left would be a Canadian
30-06 mag as its wider than the 7.92 and the angle of the mag mouth ?
2nd from left 7.92 Inglis,doesn't look quite stretched enough to be 30-06 T41
3rd from left UK
.280
4th from left...... ? but maybe .280 EM2 before the mag was modified to also fit the Bren ? Not sure the bar going full width would work with a bren mag well ? But don't know sod all about the EM2 !
Right top Canadian pattern .280
Bottom 303
I'll go for the 4th from the left that is the one that wont fit some sort of Bren.(without a lump hammer !)
Looks like I may be buying the beer Warren :-(
ATB Kevin
-
-
Advisory Panel
-
-
Legacy Member
4th from the left looks very much like a mag from the EM1 rifle, the one to the left is the later EM2 mag modified for the Bren, the earlier (Pure EM2) mag had a spine that ran from top to bottom.
-
-
Legacy Member
Anyone got a definate answer yet?
-