+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: To Buy or not to buy - that is the question

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member RobD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    06-08-2025 @ 11:40 AM
    Location
    UK / South Africa
    Posts
    944
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    07:00 AM
    Alan, my MLE Mk I has serial numbers on bolt and right side of receiver ring (not the rear side wall of the receiver where yours is numbered), and on the right of the barrel just fore of the receiver ring.
    As regards negotiating with the dealer:
    1. A good bore is hard to find in a miltary-marked MLE. Most of the MLEs I see in use at the range are commercial (private purchase) rifles.
    2. What is the date on your rifle? Obviously pre-1902 preferable (Boer War usage).
    3. Any unit designations on the buttplate tang?
    4. The bolt dust cover has a couple of holes drilled in it which should not be there.
    5. Need some better pics, but from what I can see, the nocks form has the BSA emblem. The military barrel would not have a BSA emblem, but the letter E (Enfield rifling). If a BSA emblem, this means the rifle was re-barrelled with a commercial BSA barrel, e.g. in South Africa in the 1930s. That would be a plus as regards shooting the rifle, but would bring the price down.
    I would estimate around £650 - £750 for the rifle if the bore was very good.

    I think this rifle might be from South Africa... partly because of the re-barrel (??), partly because the extra serial number would fit witha SA Weapons Register number, and partly because I wonder if there are some vague markings on the receiver ring seen in pic 5 which might be the South African U+broad arrow or U+diamond (?). If you can get some good-quality pictures of the receiver, nocks form, barrel under the top handguard, butt socket, and buttplate tang, I would be able to tell you more about this rifle.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by RobD; 05-31-2010 at 11:07 AM.

  2. Thank You to RobD For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts