+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Cocking piece difference in No1 and No4 etc

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-20-2025 @ 11:18 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,645
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    02:23 PM
    Sorry to be a little bit contrary chaps BUT........... Unless you know different and can show me where it says so in the EMER's, user or technical handbooks, there was never a reason for a soldier to un-cock his rifle from the cocked position by using the cocking piece. It would be absolutely taboo. Even if he had a misfire, he'd simply eject the round and carry on firing. Decocking was always by firing off the action.

    Armourers only were taught to close the bolts during inspections etc etc by squeezing the trigger at the same time so that the cocking piece went forwards under control on the short to long cam. This is the only way in which there will be insufficient, even accidental force on the striker to set a cartridge off

    This situation also arises with the Browning No2 and L9 pistols currently in use. If it's loaded and 'ready', with a live round in the chamber, then the safety is put ON and there the hammer stays. You try to 'de-cock' at your peril, knowing that a wet or cold hand and one slip will earn you a rocket up the xxxe AND a fine of 28 days pay. PLUS any damage caused. And if anyone is injured or worse, then the world will collapse around your ears.

    So, unless there is a proper inbuilt means to de-cock, then don't do it. Just unload or put the safe to SAFE

  2. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    09:23 AM
    The milled in "grasping grooves" are a bit of a mystery, though. What is their actual intended (and safe) function?

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #13
    Deceased January 15th, 2016 Beerhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    01-02-2016 @ 04:03 PM
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    1,181
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    01:23 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by RobSmith View Post
    The Enfield also has a "half-cock" feature, only way to achieve it is to hold on to the cocking piece and pull the trigger, that way the firing pin would not be resting on the primer. Can't see why anyone would want to use it though instead of the regular safety catch.
    Not the case. The official way to half-cock a Lee-Enfield is to pull the uncocked cocking piece to the rear until the sear engages with the half bent. To remove the half cock one pulls the cocking piece further to the rear until, the sear engages the full bent. ("Today we had naming of parts." to quote the poem.)

    The half-cock was an anachronistic left over from the time when Lee-Enfilds did not have safety catches. I was told during training that it was there: "to provide an additional safety."
    Last edited by Beerhunter; 06-19-2010 at 05:23 AM.

  7. #14
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-20-2025 @ 11:18 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,645
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    02:23 PM
    ALMOST correct lads but............ The reason for the half cock is that of an inbuilt mechanical safety. Nothing more or less.

    I won't go into the mechanicals, but if a rifle is fired with the bolt not fully closed down, then on recoil, the bolt could lift and be (literally) fired backwards into the firers face. For example, if the bolt head were unscrewed a complete turn. To prevent this, should you fire it in this condition or the bolt not fully locked down, the rifle will 'half-fire' or half locked into 'half-cock'. Hence the phrase '...going off at half cock....'. A bit like the Englandicon football team last night. But I digress.

    Once it has gone off at half cock (the rifle, not the footy team..... although they do need shooting....) the only way to get it back is to grip the cocking piece and FULLY cock the rifle again. Now, the firer KNOWS that something is mechanically (broken part etc) or physically (didn't lock the bolt properly) wrong

    It could be that there is a fault with the rifle, such as a broken cocking piece or defective safety catch or locking bolt that will also cause a mechanical problem, so this mechanical inbuilt safety prevents the half locked rifle from firing.

    Great question

    From this, you'll see that while there might be a reason to COCK the rifle again, there is NEVER a reason to deliberately 'un-cock' or half cock the rifle

  8. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  9. #15
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,008
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    06:23 AM
    I believe Reynolds said the round shape of the MkI or "button" cocking piece was to reduce the likelihood of injury to the right hand when bayonet fighting.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  10. #16
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:47 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,283
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    11:23 PM
    Mr. Laidlericon has raised another critical issue in raising the issue of the "safety" function of the half-cock notch on the cocking piece. Note that in the original Lee system, the trigger and sear were coupled together.

    There are two tiny but vitally important bits of metal involved in the additional safety function as per SMLE, No4, and No5 series.

    These can be found as that little island in the cam track area at the rear of the bolt body and the lump on the top of the forward end of the cocking piece. These little lugs are “safety studs”.

    As the bolt is cycled, these studs orbit around each other. However, when the bolt has not been properly closed and the trigger is pulled, one of two things will happen:

    1. The stud on the cocking piece may strike the rear right hand side radius of the safety lug on the bolt body and thus fully close the breech. The rifle may not fire however, as the striker will have been significantly slowed by this action.

    2. The stud on the cocking piece may strike the small flat on the rear of the safety lug on the bolt body and stop dead, thus preventing the striker from moving forward to fire the cartridge. Closing the bolt from this point, with the trigger released, will result in the cocking piece moving forward over the sear, until the sear nose enters the half cock notch. When the nose of the sear has entered the half cock notch, the rifle cannot be fired. Also, the bolt cannot be opened because the safety studs are beside each other, thus preventing bolt rotation. The cocking piece must be manually withdrawn to the fully cocked position to get things going again.

    The half cock notch prevents the firing of a cartridge when the bolt is not fully closed and locked or in the event the rifle is dropped or jarred and the sear disengages from the full-bent of the cocking piece.

    I have seen several bolts with the safety stud missing. I have never established whether it was “removed” deliberately or broken off due to metallurgical issues or extreme abuse.

  11. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


  12. #17
    Legacy Member RobSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last On
    05-15-2021 @ 10:10 AM
    Location
    Dorion, Qc
    Age
    49
    Posts
    147
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    09:23 AM
    Truth be told I only found out about the "falf cock" feature accidentally. Was inspecting a buddy's rifle and decided to ease the firing pin down while holding to the cocking piece after having checked the chamber. You can imagine my horror when the rifle locked up on me as a result. A few minutes of fiddling while my buddy was not exactly happy with me and all was well.

  13. #18
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:51 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,008
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    06:23 AM
    I don't understand, all you have to do is press the trigger and flip the bolt handle down if you don't want to dry fire it...

  14. #19
    Legacy Member RobSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last On
    05-15-2021 @ 10:10 AM
    Location
    Dorion, Qc
    Age
    49
    Posts
    147
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    09:23 AM
    Lots of people out there aren't quite intricately familiar with the internal mechanics of their rifle, and don't know that as a result.

    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    I don't understand, all you have to do is press the trigger and flip the bolt handle down if you don't want to dry fire it...

  15. #20
    (Deceased April 21, 2018) John Sukey (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last On
    05-14-2012 @ 06:03 PM
    Location
    Tucson Arizona
    Posts
    762
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    06:23 AM
    And if you don't want a round in the chamber with a full magazine, simply press down on the rounds with your thumb and ease the bolt forward OVER the rounds in the magazine. Not exactly rocket science. As stated previously, holding the trigger back while closing the bolt on an empty chamber will decock it.

    Now the only cocking piece that was withdrawn from service was the one without ridges, (a wartime economy measure)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Cocking piece fouling
    By PrinzEugen in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-13-2010, 05:09 AM
  2. Is my cocking piece broke?
    By three0three in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-08-2009, 08:54 AM
  3. loose cocking piece 303 no.4
    By Hornant in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-02-2009, 05:32 AM
  4. loose cocking piece 303 no.4
    By Hornant in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2009, 08:56 AM
  5. Cocking piece.
    By Enfieldlock in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-20-2009, 01:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts