Bruce, that was my original point last week. Poor quality pictures do one of two things. They either 1) hide the truth of an exaggerated description, or 2) fail to identify and showcase of details of a real collector item.

Even if most people do not have deep enough pockets to get into a bidding war over a real collector item, it is sometimes nice for all of us to see it (and drool). Makes it that more of a desirable collectable.

Wish GB would have minimum picture quality standards.

Just my two cents worth,...