-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
Mark in Rochester
were there some HRA NM rifles that never had the selector leg?
I believe those were TRW rifles.
-
07-06-2010 07:36 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
MrJitters
I'm no expert on this , but if he is the inheritor (not an executor of an estate) of a legally owned with papers
M14
(that is the big catch here) then legal possession of the firearm could possibly pass to him, pending transfer and all legalities.
Read this:
http://www.orl-llc.com/Files/ATF%20O...t%20Branch.htm
Now go get a NFA versed lawyer. That rifle could be too valuable to destroy if you do not need too, or not valuable enough to spend 10 years of your life with bubba.
He said U.S. M14 in Canada
.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
NO US Rifle, 7.62 MM, M14
, NOT even the specifcally manufactured national match rifle produced by TRW were made without selective fire capabilities. That being said, most but by no means all NM M14's, either originally manufactured as NM rifle (only TRW made from scrath NM M14's) or build from existing rifle had the select fire capibilities disabled by welding/soldering/brazing the selector lock on.
Sniper188, your M14 HAD selective fire capabilities it just had the selector lock installed that prevent Private Snuffy from playing John Wayne.
It sound like deevyious is in Canada
. So what goes here in the States has nothing to do with what goes in Canada.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I don't want to sound like I am blowing my own horn BUT I own 2 that is right 2 registered/transferable NON-welded US Rifle, 7.62 MM, M14
. One is a TRW and the other is a H&R.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Last edited by MrJitters; 07-07-2010 at 06:06 PM.
-
Legacy Member
-
Thank You to Joe W For This Useful Post: