+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: P.14 & M. 17 Historical Query

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,676
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    06:51 AM
    We've got a couple of those at work Mk7. It was one of this type of offset conversions that was used to formulate the fitting of the cheek rest. The rest as they say, is history

    On the subject of snipers as related to what Mk7 has said above and the like, there's a few lines in the Small Arms School weapon training memorandum dated March 1940 that states:
    1 SNIPERS
    As snipers no longer form part of the organization of the infantry section, the reference to their use in Para 1 and 2 on page 4 of pamphlet No2 should be deleted.

    There's a few more odds and sode referring to the No3T and No4T rifles that I'll pass on when I get round to it
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Peter Laidler; 07-28-2010 at 04:40 PM. Reason: speeling misteaks

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,058
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    10:51 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    ....On the subject of snipers...there's a few lines in the Small Arms School weapon training memorandum dated March 1940 that states:
    1 SNIPERS
    As snipers no longer form part of the organization of the infantry section, the reference to their use in Para 1 and 2 on page 4 of pamphlet No2 should be deleted
    I wonder if this meant the revival of a separate intelligence/sniping section instead of the snipers being divied out among the rifle companies.

    Will resist a la Strangelove temptation to take thread off topic into MGC etc!

    Whenever I handle one of my P14s I have a little grin at Reynold's comment about "the rather rough ("Sniff, sniff") American P14",

    All round the best Mauser ever made really.

    To correct somewhat what I wrote before, Skennertonicon in "The US Enfield" (which covers both the P14 and M17), says scopes were fitted to P14s 'unofficially' by the Canadians, Australians and others in 1917 & 1918. I have seen a photo of Canadianicon snipers in Mons in 1918 holding both P14s and Ross MkIIIs. The scopes unfortunately are not visible.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Historical Query
    By Strangely Brown in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-23-2010, 02:00 AM
  2. Another helmet...historical?
    By Garandrew in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-23-2009, 06:28 PM
  3. Gun Proof in India - An Historical Account
    By Amatikulu in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-29-2009, 09:09 PM
  4. Springfield Armory Historical Picture of the Week
    By Ramboueille in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 09:59 PM
  5. NZ Antique and Historical Arms Canterbury Branch meeting
    By broadarrow303 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-07-2008, 08:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts