Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Non-political question about proposed sale of Korean M1s

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #15
    Legacy Member Joe W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-20-2021 @ 09:25 PM
    Location
    S.W. Florida
    Posts
    720
    Local Date
    05-14-2025
    Local Time
    06:41 PM
    I think Akulahawk has hit the nail on the head. If "loaned" under a military assistance program the weapons could not be sold and imported into the U.S. They would have to be returned to the U.S. Govt. and then could be turned over to CMPicon. In the case of these M1icon's from Korea, I believe they were sold or given to Korea.
    What I don't understand is that it is said that when CMP inquired of Franceicon, regarding M1 rifles loaned by the U.S. to France, they were told that the rifles had been either destroyed or sold. It seems like if the rifles are sold or destroyed the U.S. can't or won't do anything about it. So what was the point of calling it a loan ?? I thought you were expected to return loans.
    Last edited by Joe W; 08-15-2010 at 09:26 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Question re: Classifieds - For Sale or Auction Elsewhere
    By Baal in forum Q&A - VBBS Bulletin Board Software
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-04-2010, 08:15 PM
  2. Not a political question, but
    By ARCHER 9505 in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-12-2009, 11:44 AM
  3. M1 Carbines on the proposed Forbidden list
    By Louis of PA in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 10:05 AM
  4. NFA Official Response to Proposed Amendments to Bill C-301
    By X-man in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 05:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts