Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: WW2 Rebuilds

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Advisory Panel John Beard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    01-24-2025 @ 10:45 PM
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    1,098
    Local Date
    05-05-2025
    Local Time
    05:08 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by P-07ShortLee View Post
    A few questions regarding 03's rebuilt during WW2. Not counting rifles with "single heat treat" #s that have replacement barrels or the Sedgely 44 barrels.

    Was the "hatcher" hole normally added during rebuild? Or was the addition of the hole limited to the pre-WW2 years?

    Were "C" stocks "normal" for rebuild?

    Were any of the rebuilds of "battle used" rifles? Or just broken/worn on hand?

    And finally, why do some people consider the WW2 rebuilds "junk"?
    The following statements apply to U.S. Army rebuilds, not Navy or USMC.

    (1) Hatcher Holes were not added to rebuilds until after WWII.

    (2) No. Scant stocks were normal for rebuilds.

    (3) Rebuilds included "battle used" rifles. But most combat troops were armed with M1icon Garands, carbines, Thompsons, etc.

    (4) Some purists who collect pristine original and/or rare rifles may consider WWII rebuilds as junk. But they are greatly outnumbered.

    Hope this helps.

    J.B.

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to John Beard For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. M1C rebuilds
    By rice 123 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-21-2010, 09:50 PM
  2. Indo Chinese, 98 type Mauser rebuilds or captures?
    By lambo35 in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-05-2009, 05:01 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts