Quote Originally Posted by Joe W View Post
I never really understood why these Facility identification markings on rifle stocks were used in the first place. It seems that, as the markings are on the stock, they could only have any meaning while in the rebuild facility. Maybe some form of indicator to armory personel that the weapon has already been through the system ???? It seems that after the weapon is put back in service the mark would mean nothing to anyone, as the stock could be changed at any point. Even the earlier etching on the receiver leg really means little once the rifle is back in service. At least with the facility code on the receiver, if a problem should develop after the rifle is back in service, the rifle could be traced back to the facility doing the last KNOWN overhaul, if need be. I am sure there must be a logical reason but it has evaded me.
Joe,

Each facility was reimbursed for each rifle and the marks were evidence that at least each rifle and stock was inspected and/or rebuilt/repaired.

I see two separate inspections here: One for the hardware and one for the stock.