Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Toronto Archives photo search on John Inglis Plant/bren guns

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Legacy Member tankhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last On
    06-28-2023 @ 05:15 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,054
    Real Name
    Mike
    Local Date
    07-04-2025
    Local Time
    09:04 AM
    I would imagine from my Own Expierence in Defence Manufacturing. That the Tripod in question would have been almost certainly modified in the factory itself for the purpose of test firing of Brens from a purely conviniece point. And also, that the firing port on the indoor range was so high, it nessesitated the extention the the mount legs to enable the weapons to fire through it.
    This would have been a simple mod to execute, by simply cutting the feet & the 'Clutch Heads' on the legs off. And rewelding onto tubes of suitable diameter & length desired, the feet & 'Clutch Heads' as required.
    A LOT of one off's were done like this is various manufacturing plants to enable certain repetitive tasks to be done & expidite them as quickly as possible. Wartime manufacturing, as you can imagine was not about total
    quality, but Quantitiy!
    NOTE the Rifle slings attached to the Bren tripod, which was the CORRECT carrying method when being 'Manpacked' by manpower alone. I have in my own collection & im absolutey CERTAIN a lot of Fellow forum Member have also. A 'Purpose made' tan canvas tripod carrying harness for these tripods. They are very common here in the UKicon. This is to my mind, a strange affair, as In mY opinion. The web material is a tad on the Thin side for such a heavy mount. In service my view is that they would not survive for very long through wear & tear, & would quickly cut through the material after a short time in usage. I wonder if this was for Foriegn contract? Perhaps NZicon or India? I dont know for sure, but all seem to originate from a factory in Stockport 'Up North'. Also, all seem to be in unissued condition, indicating that they were never used! The rifle sling method was fine, thick durable items that would easily survive in usage. So to that end, WHY were these thin harnesses ever made? And that they were, why was the material so flimsy to self evidently not be able to get through the Ravages od Military Service!............Anybody got any definitive Info? I would be very interested to know the Answer! Mike.
    Last edited by tankhunter; 12-22-2010 at 03:41 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Inglis 7.92mm Bren
    By Brit plumber in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 10-13-2010, 09:35 PM
  2. Inglis 1942 MK 1m 3/1 BREN GUN AND CHEST
    By grant580 in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-09-2010, 07:29 PM
  3. Interesting Photo - 'Hybrid' Bren Guns Carried By Vichy French Milice Militia
    By peregrinvs in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-18-2010, 08:19 AM
  4. John Inglis and Small Arms Ltd
    By Badger in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 03:44 PM
  5. M2HB Cover part marked by John Inglis co.?
    By mrclark in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-16-2010, 10:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts