-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Early Inland on GB
What is the thought on this one?
I sent a question to the seller to see what is on the inside.
The buttplate looks to be a later type, but the stock looks correct.
M1
CARBINE "42" INLAND w/H/W I-CUT STOCK : Semi-auto at GunBroker.com
The pics need to be a little closer for good detail.
Dave
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
12-24-2010 02:57 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Its interesting, the little symbol is there on top of the stock near the receiver, known to be on early Inlands, but who knows whats inside
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
usgicollector: Did you get an answer from him about the interior pieces?
I asked about a return policy and never heard back. thanks
-
Legacy Member
Return policy not listed...scary
-
-
firstflabn
Guest
CCNL #184 Square pattern buttplate on 25k Inland
CCNL #257 Diagonal pattern buttplate on 24k Inland
CCNL #282 Square pattern buttplate on 18k Inland
So, if these are all righteous, the transition discussed in CCNL #346 appears to already be under way when the Gunbroker carbine was being put together, making either type correct (and a candidate for original). Barrel dates are as expected. The two lower numbered rifles have long barrel skirts, so no delay for rework of that feature. 25k does not report on skirt.
-
Thank You to firstflabn For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
New pics added, trigger housing looks rusty, worn, around correct early retaining pin..but it looks rusted? Rust on hammer spring plunger/spring too
Last edited by Garandrew; 12-28-2010 at 03:00 PM.
-
-
Contributing Member

Originally Posted by
Garandrew
New pics added, trigger housing looks rusty, worn, around correct early retaining pin..but it looks rusted? Rust on hammer spring plunger/spring too
It looked better before he opened the hood!
Doesn’t it also look like some pretty serious rust between the front of the receiver and the slide box in the last picture? And, doesn’t the Parkerizing (if that is what it is) on the top of the receiver look better than would be expected after seeing the inside?
Carbine collector in training.
John
-
-
Legacy Member
My thoughts exactly, thats why the pics werent posted earlier
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Does anyone know who the seller is?
I'm probally in anyway.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I asked about return policy but never heard back, that would keep me from bidding.