Quote Originally Posted by Amatikuluicon View Post
Maybe it's just me, but frankly apart from the curiosity factor, I would not buy a fake No.32 scope with questionable pedigree for $600. If I'm going to have a non original scope on my No.4 Mark 1(T), I'd stick with my $30 Weaver as it's got good optics and has a genuine pedigree,

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...T/IM001222.jpg
Which model weaver is that?

---------- Post added at 08:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:43 PM ----------
Quote Originally Posted by Brian Dickicon View Post
I think I've covered this before. Telescopes all require export licensing in the USAicon for permanent export. Current manufacture telescopes and optical sights made for tactical use have to be licensed by The Directorate of Defense Trade Control, U.S. Dept. of State and sporting telescopes and some red dot sights by The U.S. Department of Commerce. You can pop one in a jiffy bag and send it and chances are it might make it just fine. However, there's a small chance that it gets picked up and then the fine is a million bucks. Welcome to the land of the free. We're the most difficult country in what's left of the so-called "free Western world" to import/export firearms related items. It's a fact.
Ah democracy.