-
Legacy Member
My father, uncle and father in law all served in the WWII US Navy, Pacific Fleet. The J@@@ didn't fight in an honorable fashion, starting with the sneak attack at Pearl Harbor, followed on by the Bataan Death March, torpedoing of hospital ships, and the countless atrocities in the Philippines and mainland China. They fought with no quarter, and we learned to give none. As these raw memories fade with the passing of that generation, I suppose new collector interest will rise. I, for one, won't have any of it in my house.
-
Thank You to limpetmine For This Useful Post:
-
01-13-2011 08:47 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
jmoore
Oh, as someone from a "loser's country" I don't think it has much to do with anything! We'uns just lost a little further back in time...Besides, I don't recall
Italy
or
France
losing WWI, or Japan losing a war from 1905 until 1945, quite the opposite, in fact!
I agree with your words, jmoore
---------- Post added at 03:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:36 PM ----------
[/COLOR]

Originally Posted by
limpetmine
My father, uncle and father in law all served in the WWII US Navy, Pacific Fleet. The J@@@ didn't fight in an honorable fashion, starting with the sneak attack at Pearl Harbor, followed on by the Bataan Death March, torpedoing of hospital ships, and the countless atrocities in the Philippines and mainland China. They fought with no quarter, and we learned to give none. As these raw memories fade with the passing of that generation, I suppose new collector interest will rise. I, for one, won't have any of it in my house.
That also coulda be a reason 'cause people "don't like" Japanese
rifles. Anyway I belive we mustn't follow this thought line. Who in Europe would collect (have at home) any Mauser K98
...? We must collect fireguns 'cause they have a history on thir background and compare their accuracy.
Many thanks for your opinion
Last edited by blackcat_attilio; 01-13-2011 at 09:49 AM.
Blackcat
-
Thank You to blackcat_attilio For This Useful Post:
-
-
Contributing Member
-
Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I was always told that Jap is "junk". My Dad peed his pants when I bought one (Type 38). Nice shooting rifle! Some of my friends were/ are prejudiced against them... but no big deal. I have added some to my collection over the years... and yes... probably my most cherished and pretty "favorite" rifle is my wall hanger! Type 99 that was a Battle Field pickup from Okinawa. I won't shoot it due to the battle damage... but I am in awe of it! It was clearly used against our guys! Obviously we were in ferocious pitched battles with these guys!!!
On occasion I do shoot my 38's and 99's, and have never found issue with them! Won't shoot my last ditch rifle... just oggle the crudeness of it....
Another reason why I started collecting them, was due to the cost. At the time K98
's were running big $$ (before all the recent RC's). The Japs were historical weapons of War, that were inexpensive, and due to start going up in price... and fine shooters!
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
limpetmine
My father, uncle and father in law all served in the WWII US Navy, Pacific Fleet. The J@@@ didn't fight in an honorable fashion, starting with the sneak attack at Pearl Harbor, followed on by the Bataan Death March, torpedoing of hospital ships, and the countless atrocities in the Philippines and mainland China. They fought with no quarter, and we learned to give none. As these raw memories fade with the passing of that generation, I suppose new collector interest will rise. I, for one, won't have any of it in my house.
I think this, at least in my experience.
-
Advisory Panel
Anyone who knows their history cannot hold one of those rifles or bayonets without wondering how many civilians were shot by it or spitted on it. They're FUGLY for the most part, but yes, they are damn well built as P.O. Ackley established. Same goes for the swords. You have to know the context.
A lot of superficial Western Walter Mitty's are quite taken with the aura of the swords, "bushido" and all that. Just as the same type are often quite taken with german uniforms etc. One can admire the workmanship, but let's not kid ourselves, the samurai were trained to total unquestioning obedience and a capacity for savage cruelty that would curl your ears; before they were sliced off. Their code bore no resemblance to the western code of chivalry. A lot of people have trouble encompassing the contradiction of their admiration for the workmanship and the diligence, and the reality of the behaviour and the racist, supremacist mentality that underlays it. Asian societies operate on "face" and shame basically. You didn't surrender because if you did, you could never return home, and if you were known to have surrendered or even been captured alive, the shame would probably force your family to kill themselves or disappear by moving somewhere where they were unknown. Those Japanese
who did surrender or were captured were often quite happy to tell everything they knew to their captors once they had escaped the vise of Japanese society, but they often said that they could never return to Japan. Takes a little thinking about, doesn't it?
Last edited by Surpmil; 01-24-2011 at 01:28 PM.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
Surpmil
Anyone who knows their history cannot hold one of those rifles or bayonets without wondering how many civilians were shot by it or spitted on it. They're FUGLY for the most part, but yes, they are damn well built as P.O. Ackley established. Same goes for the swords. You have to know the context.
Many thanks for your opinion. BTW, I agree with your words.
Blackcat
-
-
-
Thank You to riceone For This Useful Post:
-
They are important to study if you have an interest in Allied arms of the period. Just part of "know your enemy", if nothing else.
A serious underestimation of the Germans and esp. the Japanese
by the the Allies were part of the problem prior to WWII. Japan had more LMGs per capita than just about any other WWII army. Zero fighters. Far superior torpedos to the US. Hard training and years of combat experience in China. You don't have to like 'em, but...!
-
Thank You to jmoore For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
riceone
There were only about 1.2 million Japanese
rifle brought to the US by returning Vets. The rest were thrown in the ocean. There never were stock piles in warehouse like the German
and other military rifles. There fore they are getting scarcer and scarcer. However with the vets dying they are showing up.
They are very well made rifle and did an excellent job for a bolt action rifle. The simplicity of the rifles make them ideal for combat. I have been collecting them for 60 years and still am. They have gotten quite expensive. I dickering with a guy now for a rifle that will cost at least $4k if I get it. The nice and rare ones are expensive. To me they were the best battle rifle of the bolt action clan.
riceone
Hollo riceone !
Very interesting to understand more about why is not easy find out a Japanese rifle; meanwhile many thanks for your opinion about how they were/are made. Many thanks!
Blackcat
-